Back to Search Start Over

Differences in Immunological Landscape between EGFR-Mutated and Wild-Type Lung Adenocarcinoma

Authors :
Jiawei Luo
Jia-Lu Wang
Fengying Wu
Caicun Zhou
Xuefei Li
Xue-Cheng Sun
Yan-Hua Guo
Source :
Disease Markers, Disease Markers, Vol 2021 (2021)
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Hindawi, 2021.

Abstract

Recent clinical trials of lung adenocarcinoma with immune checkpoint inhibitors revealed that lung adenocarcinoma patients with EGFR mutations have a poor response to immunotherapy. However, the mechanisms have not been addressed. We performed immunohistochemistry analyses of resected lung adenocarcinoma tissues with and without EGFR mutations to investigate and compare the characteristics of the tumor microenvironment (TME). We retrospectively enrolled a total of 323 lung adenocarcinoma patients (164 had EGFR mutations), and their corresponding tissue samples were analyzed by the EGFR mutation test and immunohistochemistry. We selected the markers of the immune checkpoint molecule (PD1, PD-L1, and LAG-3) and immune cell (CD3, CD4, CD8, and Foxp3) as markers of the tumor microenvironment. Our results revealed that patients had a distinct tumor microenvironment between EGFR-mutant and wild-type lung adenocarcinomas; the expression of CD3, CD4, PD-L1, and Foxp3 in EGFR-mutant tumors was significantly higher than that in wild-type tumors, while the expression of LAG3 and PD-1 showed a positive correlation with EGFR-wild-type tumors. In survival analysis, EGFR-wild-type patients had longer disease-free survival (DFS) than EGFR-mutant patients ( P = 0.0065 ). Our research demonstrates significant differences in tumor microenvironment composition between EGFR-mutant and wild-type patients. Our findings provide novel evidence that contributes to understanding the mechanism underlying the poor efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
02780240
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Disease Markers
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....57c90ac417e1adc41a3961bbef91b9d5
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/3776854