Back to Search Start Over

Comparative analysis of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, double-contrast upper gastrointestinal barium X-ray radiography, and the titer of serum anti-Helicobacter pylori IgG focusing on the diagnosis of atrophic gastritis

Authors :
Yosuke Tsuji
Ryoichi Wada
Rie Matsuda
Chihiro Takeuchi
Chiemi Nakayama
Toru Mitsushima
Chihiro Minatsuki
Mitsuhiro Fujishiro
Shinya Kodashima
Takeshi Shimamoto
Kazuhiko Koike
Nobutake Yamamichi
Chigaya Hirano
Yu Takahashi
Satoshi Ono
Source :
Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. 19(2)
Publication Year :
2015

Abstract

Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGI-ES) and double-contrast upper gastrointestinal barium X-ray radiography (UGI-XR) are two major image-based methods to diagnose atrophic gastritis, which is mostly induced by Helicobacter pylori infection. However, there have been few studies directly comparing them.Atrophic gastritis was evaluated using the data of 962 healthy subjects who underwent UGI-ES and UGI-XR within 1 year.Based on UGI-ES and UGI-XR, 602 subjects did not have atrophic gastritis and 254 subjects did have it. Considering UGI-ES-based atrophic gastritis as the standard, sensitivity and specificity of UGI-XR-based atrophic gastritis were 92.0 % (254/276) and 92.8 % (602/649), respectively. The seven-grade Kimura-Takemoto classification of UGI-ES-based atrophic gastritis showed a strong and significant association with the four-grade UGI-XR-based atrophic gastritis. Sensitivity and specificity of serum anti-Helicobacter pylori IgG to detect UGI-ES/UGI-XR-based atrophic gastritis were 89.4 % (227/254) and 99.8 % (601/602), indicating that atrophic gastritis can be overlooked according to serum anti-Helicobacter pylori IgG alone.

Details

ISSN :
14363305
Volume :
19
Issue :
2
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....58655b765e8c857b97b4d78680825bd6