Back to Search
Start Over
Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial of Nabilone for Agitation in Alzheimer's Disease
- Source :
- The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. 27:1161-1173
- Publication Year :
- 2019
- Publisher :
- Elsevier BV, 2019.
-
Abstract
- Objective To investigate the efficacy and safety of nabilone for agitation in patients with moderate-to-severe Alzheimer's disease (AD). Design This 14-week randomized double-blind crossover trial compared nabilone to placebo (6 weeks each) with a 1-week washout between phases. Setting Patients were recruited from a long-term care facility and geriatric psychiatry clinics. Participants Patients had AD (standardized Mini-Mental State Examination [sMMSE ≤24]) and agitation (Neuropsychiatric Inventory-Nursing Home version [NPI-NH]-agitation/aggression subscore ≥3). Intervention Nabilone (target 1–2 mg) versus placebo. Measurements The primary outcome was agitation (Cohen Mansfield Agitation Inventory [CMAI]). Secondary outcomes included NPI-NH total, NPI-NH caregiver distress, cognition (sMMSE and Severe Impairment Battery [SIB] or Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale of Cognition), global impression (Clinician's Global Impression of Change [CGIC]), and adverse events. Results Thirty-nine patients (mean ± SD age = 87 ± 10, sMMSE = 6.5 ± 6.8, CMAI = 67.9 ± 17.6, NPI-NH total = 34.3 ± 15.8, 77% male, nabilone dose = 1.6 ± 0.5 mg) were randomized. There were no crossover or treatment-order effects. Using a linear mixed model, treatment differences (95% CI) in CMAI (b = −4.0 [−6.5 to −1.5], t(30.2) = −3.3, p = 0.003), NPI-NH total (b = −4.6 [−7.5 to −1.6], t(32.9) = −3.1, p = 0.004), NPI-NH caregiver distress (b = −1.7 [−3.4 to −0.07, t(33.7) = −2.1, p = 0.041), and sMMSE (b = 1.1 [0.1–2.0], t(22.6) = 2.4, p = 0.026) all favored nabilone. However, in those who completed the SIB (n = 25) treatment differences favored placebo (b = −4.6 [−7.3 to −1.8], t(20.7) = −4.8, p = 0.003). CGIC improvement during nabilone (47%) and placebo (23%) was not significantly different (McNemar's test, exact p = 0.09). There was more sedation during nabilone (45%) compared to placebo (16%) phases (McNemar's test, exact p = 0.02), but treatment-limiting sedation was not significantly different (McNemar's test, exact p = 0.22). Conclusions Nabilone may be an effective treatment for agitation. However, sedation and cognition should be closely monitored.
- Subjects :
- Male
Sedation
Placebo-controlled study
Placebo
law.invention
03 medical and health sciences
Cognition
0302 clinical medicine
McNemar's test
Double-Blind Method
Randomized controlled trial
Alzheimer Disease
law
medicine
Homes for the Aged
Humans
Dronabinol
Adverse effect
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Psychiatric Status Rating Scales
030214 geriatrics
business.industry
Crossover study
Nursing Homes
Aggression
Nabilone
Psychiatry and Mental health
Treatment Outcome
Anesthesia
Female
Geriatrics and Gerontology
medicine.symptom
business
Antipsychotic Agents
medicine.drug
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 10647481
- Volume :
- 27
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....58d7b3157875f256dacf9f01a8db8621
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jagp.2019.05.002