Back to Search Start Over

Summarised, verified and accessible: improving clinical information management for potential haematopoietic stem cell transplantation patients

Authors :
Jennifer Pepperall
Sarah Dyer
Elaine Davies
Felicity Nicola Jane May
Nathan Proudlove
Margaret Tracey Rees
Source :
BMJ Open Quality, Vol 10, Iss 4 (2021), May, F, Pepperall, J, Davies, E, Dyer, S, Proudlove, N & Rees, M T 2021, ' Summarised, verified and accessible : Improving clinical information management for potential haematopoietic stem cell transplantation patients ', BMJ Open Quality, vol. 10, no. 4, e001605 . https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001605, BMJ Open Quality
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
BMJ Publishing Group, 2021.

Abstract

The Welsh Transplantation and Immunogenetics Laboratory (WTAIL) is responsible for managing patient work-up for haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), the only potentially curative option for many haematological and non-haematological conditions. Work-up requires regular communication between WTAIL and the transplanting clinicians, facilitated by weekly multidisciplinary team (MDT) meetings, to agree decisions and proceed through each work-up stage. Effective communication and minimising error are critical, as transplanting cells from a suboptimal donor could have severe or fatal consequences for the patient. We reviewed our HSCT patient management and identified issues including staff dissatisfaction with the inefficiency of the current (paper-based) system and concern about the potential for incidents caused by errors in manual transcription of patient information and tracking clinical decisions. Another driver for change was the COVID-19 pandemic, which prevented the usual face-to-face MDT meetings in which staff would show clinicians the paper records and reports; the shift to online MDT required new ways of sharing data. In this project we developed a new central reference point for our patient management data along with electronic patient summary sheets, designed with an eye to improving safety and efficiency. Over several improvement cycles we tested and refined the summary sheets with staff and clinicians and experimented with videoconferencing to facilitate data sharing. We conducted interviews with staff from which we concluded that the new process successfully reduced transcription and duplication and improved communication with the clinicians during the pandemic. Despite an increase in workload due to build-up of active patient work-up cases during the pandemic, staff reported that the new summaries enabled them to cope well. A key initiative was creation of a ‘Task and Finish’ group that helped establish continual improvement culture and identified additional areas for improvement which have been followed up in further improvement projects.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
23996641
Volume :
10
Issue :
4
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
BMJ Open Quality
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....5a04d388f9c8436757b41b8fcb8f6e2d