Back to Search Start Over

Do womenor=50 years of age need as much screening as women50 years after they have had negative screening results?

Authors :
Zanier L
Carlo Naldoni
Anna Iossa
Marco Zappa
E Polla
Stefano Ciatto
P Armaroli
Nereo Segnan
Paolo Giorgi-Rossi
D Davi
F Gallo
Mancini E
D Consonni
M Serafini
Guglielmo Ronco
V Vergini
A Bellomi
Source :
British Journal of Cancer
Publication Year :
2008

Abstract

To assess the adequacy of a routine screening to identify cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 or worse (CIN2+) in women over 50 years of age, a retrospective cohort was set in six Italian organised population-based screening programmes. In all, 287 330 women (1 714 550 person-years of observation, 1110 cases) screened at age 25–64, with at least two cytological screening tests, the first negative, were followed from their first negative smear until a biopsy proven CIN2+ lesion or their last negative smear. For women aged 25–49 and 50–64 years, crude and age-standardised detection rate (DR), cumulative risk (CR), adjusted hazard risk for number of previous negative screens, probability of false-positive CIN2+ after two or more smear tests were calculated. Detection rate is significantly lower over 50 years of age. Multivariable analysis shows a significant protective effect from four screening episodes (DR=0.70, 95% CI: 0.51–0.97); the effect of age ⩾50 is 0.29 (95% CI: 0.24–0.35). The CR of CIN2+ is at least eightfold higher in women

Details

ISSN :
15321827
Volume :
99
Issue :
2
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
British journal of cancer
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....5a12b212486a2dcdcf79d6a1c2feb57d