Back to Search Start Over

Detecting structural and functional differences in activated sludge bacterial communities originating from laboratory treatment of elementally and totally chlorine-free bleaching effluents

Authors :
Arnaldo Chaer Borges
Flávia M. L. Passos
Ann H. Mounteer
Daison Olzany Silva
Source :
Canadian Journal of Microbiology. 48:245-255
Publication Year :
2002
Publisher :
Canadian Science Publishing, 2002.

Abstract

The ability to differentiate functional and structural diversity of bacterial communities present in activated sludges adapted to elementally (ECF) and totally (TCF) chlorine-free bleaching effluents was evaluated. Community function was evaluated through substrate utilization patterns in BiologGN®microplates, and taxonomic structure was evaluated by fluorescent in situ hybridization using probes targeting the Eubacteria; the alpha, beta, and gamma subclasses of the Proteobacteria; and gram-positive bacteria with high GC content. Over 6-week sampling periods, ECF- and TCF-adapted sludge bacterial communities presented reproducible substrate utilization patterns that through principal components (PCs) analysis, separated the ECF samples from the TCF samples. Application of the fluorescent in situ hybridization technique was complicated by the intense autofluorescence of the bleaching effluent sludge samples that interfered with detection of specific hybridization signals. The most notable difference in community structure detected using the chosen set of probes was the relatively greater proportion of cells of the alpha subclass in TCF sludge (27%) than in ECF sludge (6%). Nonspecific hybridization with beta and gamma probes was relatively high, but both sludges appeared to have similar proportions of cells of the beta (20–22%) and gamma (11–12%) subclasses. The two sludges presented relatively few gram-positive cells with high GC content (

Details

ISSN :
14803275 and 00084166
Volume :
48
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Canadian Journal of Microbiology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....5a34219abed2baca2a0fc6a302a14a3f
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1139/w02-006