Back to Search Start Over

Peak Inspiratory Flow as a Predictive Therapeutic Biomarker in COPD

Authors :
Donald A. Mahler
David M.G. Halpin
Source :
Chest. 160:491-498
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2021.

Abstract

Biomarkers in COPD may be clinical (prior exacerbation history), physiologic (FEV1), or blood based (eosinophil count or fibrinogen level). Recent interest in using biomarkers to predict response to therapy in clinical practice has emerged. The benefits of inhaled therapy depend on the correct use of the inhaler, including an appropriate inspiratory flow. Of the available delivery systems, dry powder inhalers are unique because they have an internal resistance, are breath actuated, and are flow dependent. Ideally, the user inhales "forcefully" to generate turbulent energy (determined by an individual's inspiratory flow and the resistance of the device) within the device that disaggregates the powder so that the individual inhales the medication particles into the lower respiratory tract. Because of specific features of dry powder inhalers and the required optimal inspiratory flow, an unmet need exists to identify individuals who are likely or unlikely to benefit from dry powder medications. Peak inspiratory flow, defined as the maximum airflow generated during inhalation against the simulated resistance of a dry powder inhaler, is a physiologic measure that has biological plausibility, has good test characteristics (repeatability and reliability), and is generalizable. Current evidence supports peak inspiratory flow as a predictive therapeutic biomarker to optimize therapy in both outpatients with COPD as well as those hospitalized for an exacerbation before discharge. This approach is consistent with the precepts of precision medicine, which considers differences in a person's biological features, exposure, and lifestyle to prevent and treat disease.

Details

ISSN :
00123692
Volume :
160
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Chest
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....5b1cf6309b42aee7642eab07a0a0d6cb
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2021.03.049