Back to Search Start Over

Parallels between the development of therapeutic drugs and cancer health disparity programs

Authors :
Mark Dignan
Kathryn Coe
Victor Williams Tofaeono
Kenneth C. Chu
Edward Partridge
Amelie G. Ramirez
Sora Park Tanjasiri
Howard Koh
Ronda Henry-Tillman
James R. Hebert
Paula Espinoza
Margaret K. Hargreaves
Terrance L. Albrecht
Cathy D. Meade
Paul A. Godley
Grace X. Ma
Clayton Chong
Beti Thompson
Claudia R. Baquet
Elmer Huerta
Dedra Buchwald
Laura A. Beebe
Moon S. Chen
Judith Kaur
Emmanuel Taylor
David Satcher
Graham A. Colditz
Source :
Cancer. 113:2790-2796
Publication Year :
2008
Publisher :
Wiley, 2008.

Abstract

BACKGROUND There are analogies between the development of therapeutic drugs for cancer and the development of interventions for reducing cancer health disparities. In both cases, it can take between 12 and 15 years for the benefits to become apparent. METHODS The initial preclinical phase of drug development is analogous to the development of community partnerships and helping the community learn about cancer. The preclinical phase of in vitro and in vivo testing is analogous to identifying the disparities in the community. Then clinical testing begins with phase 1, toxicity, and dose-establishing studies. Analogously, community-based participatory research is used to develop disparities–reducing interventions (DRIs) within the community. RESULTS The phase 2 clinical studies to determine whether the drug has activity are analogous to the DRI being implemented in the community to determine whether it can cause behavioral changes that will reduce cancer health disparities. If a drug passes phase 1 and 2 studies, phase 3 clinical trials are initiated. These are controlled studies to examine the efficacy of the drug. The similar activity for disparities research is to determine whether the DRI is better than the current standard/usual practice in controlled trials. If the drug is beneficial, the final phase is the dissemination and adoption of the drug. Analogously in disparities, if the DRI is beneficial, it is disseminated and is culturally adapted to other racial/ethnic groups and finally adopted as standard practice. CONCLUSIONS The process of creating an effective DRI can be envisioned to have 4 stages, which can be used to aid in measuring the progress being made in reducing cancer health disparities. Cancer 2008. Published 2008 by the American Cancer Society.

Details

ISSN :
10970142 and 0008543X
Volume :
113
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Cancer
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....5b232edcf054c34a790576547a8a9485
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.23879