Back to Search Start Over

Uptake trends in the Scottish Bowel Screening Programme and the influences of age, sex, and deprivation

Authors :
Francis A. Carey
A. J. Quyn
Greig Stanners
Claire Carden
Callum G. Fraser
Aasma Shaukat
Robert Steele
Source :
Journal of Medical Screening. 25:24-31
Publication Year :
2017
Publisher :
SAGE Publications, 2017.

Abstract

Objective Age, sex, and deprivation are known factors influencing colorectal (bowel) cancer screening uptake. We investigated the influence of these factors on uptake over time. Methods Data from the Scottish Bowel Screening Programme (SBoSP) were collected between 2007 and 2014. End-points for analysis were uptake, faecal occult blood test positivity, and disease detection, adjusted for age, sex, deprivation, and year of screening. Results From 5,308,336 individual screening episodes documented, uptake gradually increased with increasing age up to 65–69 and was lower in men than women (52.4% vs. 58.7%, respectively). Deprivation had a significant effect on uptake by men and women of all age groups, with the most deprived least likely to complete a screening test. Uptake has increased with time in both sexes and across the deprivation gradient. The number needed to screen to detect significant neoplasia was significantly lower in men than women overall (170 vs. 365), and this held over all age and deprivation groups. The number needed to screen was also lower in the more deprived population. Conclusions Although lower age, male sex, and increased deprivation are associated with lower bowel cancer screening uptake in Scotland, uptake has increased since SBoSP introduction in all age groups, both sexes, and across the deprivation gradient. Despite a lower uptake, the number needed to screen to find significant disease was lower in men and in those with higher levels of deprivation.

Details

ISSN :
14755793 and 09691413
Volume :
25
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of Medical Screening
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....5b8364b95569fd774efd644f7f98ce15
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1177/0969141317694065