Back to Search
Start Over
Clinical Outcomes According to ECG Presentations in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock in the Culprit Lesion Only PCI vs Multivessel PCI in Cardiogenic Shock Trial
- Source :
- Chest, Chest, 159(4), 1415-1425. American College of Chest Physicians
- Publication Year :
- 2020
-
Abstract
- Background The impact of ECG presentations of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in cardiogenic shock is unknown. Research Question In myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock, is there a difference in the outcomes and effect of revascularization strategies between non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and left bundle branch block myocardial infarction (LBBBMI) vs ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)? Study Design and Methods Cardiogenic shock patients from the CULPRIT-SHOCK trial with NSTEMI or LBBBMI were compared with STEMI patients for 30-day and 1-year all-cause mortality. The interaction between ECG presentation and the effect of revascularization strategies on outcomes was evaluated. Results Of 665 cardiogenic shock patients analyzed, 55.9% demonstrated STEMI, 29.3% demonstrated NSTEMI, and 14.7% demonstrated LBBBMI. Patients differed in mean age (68.0 years in STEMI patients, 71.0 years in NSTEMI patients, and 73.5 years in LBBBMI patients; P = .015), cardiovascular risk factors, and angiographic severity. No difference was found in the 30-day risk of death between NSTEMI and STEMI patients (48.7% vs 43.0%; adjusted OR [aOR], 1.05; 95% CI, 0.66-1.67; P = .85), nor between LBBBMI and STEMI patients (59.2% vs 43.0%; aOR, 1.31; 95% CI, 0.73-2.34; P = .36). Although the univariate risk of death by 1 year was higher in NSTEMI and LBBBMI patients compared with STEMI patients, ECG presentation was not an independent risk factor of mortality after adjustment (NSTEMI vs STEMI: 56.4% vs 46.8%; aOR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.76-1.92; P = .42; LBBBMI vs STEMI: 69.4% vs 46.8%; aOR, 1.59; 95% CI, 0.89-2.84; P = .12). ECG presentation did not modify the effect of the revascularization strategy on 30-day and 1-year mortality (P = .91 and P = .97 for interaction). Interpretation In patients with cardiogenic shock, NSTEMI and LBBBMI presentations reflect higher-risk profiles than STEMI presentations, but are not independent risk factors of mortality. ECG presentations did not modify the treatment effect, supporting culprit-lesion-only percutaneous coronary intervention as the preferred strategy across the AMI spectrum.
- Subjects :
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
Male
medicine.medical_specialty
medicine.medical_treatment
Bundle-Branch Block
Myocardial Infarction
Shock, Cardiogenic
Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
Revascularization
STEMI
03 medical and health sciences
Electrocardiography
0302 clinical medicine
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Culprit lesion
Internal medicine
Medicine
Humans
left bundle branch block
030212 general & internal medicine
Myocardial infarction
cardiovascular diseases
Risk factor
Aged
business.industry
Left bundle branch block
Cardiogenic shock
cardiogenic shock
Percutaneous coronary intervention
medicine.disease
3. Good health
NSTEMI
030228 respiratory system
Conventional PCI
Cardiology
Female
Human medicine
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
business
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 19313543 and 00123692
- Volume :
- 159
- Issue :
- 4
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Chest
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....5e15f97e5e6d7fb22c65388cce90c381