Back to Search Start Over

The Psychological Inflexibility in Pain Scale (PIPS) Exploration of Psychometric Properties in a Heterogeneous Chronic Pain Sample

Authors :
Bianca van Baalen
Ernst Thomas Bohlmeijer
Michiel F. Reneman
Hester R. Trompetter
Karlein M.G. Schreurs
Albère Köke
Marco Kleen
Revalidatiegeneeskunde
RS: CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care
RS: CAPHRI - Rehabilitation Medicine
Extremities Pain and Disability (EXPAND)
Faculty of Behavioural, Management and Social Sciences
Psychology, Health & Technology
Source :
European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 30(4), 289-295. HOGREFE HUBER Publishers, European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 30(4), 289-295. Hogrefe Publishing, European journal of psychological assessment, 30(4), 289-295. Hogrefe Publishing
Publication Year :
2014

Abstract

Psychological flexibility receives increasing attention as the overarching process in Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT). This study investigates the psychometric properties of the Psychological Inflexibility in Pain Scale (PIPS), measuring “avoidance” and “cognitive fusion” with pain, in a heterogeneous clinical sample of 428 chronic pain patients from four rehabilitation centers. Furthermore, the relationship between the PIPS and mindfulness (Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire, FFMQ) as a theoretically related measure within ACT is explored. Confirmatory factor analyses replicated acceptable/good model fit and internal consistencies. In a subsample from two rehabilitation centers (n = 237), the PIPS showed moderate to high relationships with aspects of mindfulness, pain interference in daily life, pain disability and mental health, and small relationships with pain intensity and physical functioning. The avoidance subscale explained additional variance in outcome variables beyond the FFMQ, ranging from 4.5 to 15.8%. Outcomes support the psychometric properties of the PIPS in a heterogeneous chronic pain sample. The PIPS and FFMQ measure slightly overlapping, but distinct constructs, and can be used complementary to assess a broad range of processes within ACT. Potential problems with the cognitive fusion subscale are acknowledged for future research.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
10155759
Volume :
30
Issue :
4
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
European Journal of Psychological Assessment
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....5eb29391a10c75703212d6ccb48254f9