Back to Search Start Over

Aerobic Exercise Therapy in Ambulatory Patients With ALS

Authors :
Johanna M A Visser-Meily
Leonard H. van den Berg
Marga Tepper
Ruben P A van Eijk
Reinout O van Vliet
Esther T. Kruitwagen-van Reenen
Annerieke C. van Groenestijn
Carin D. Schröder
Jan H. Veldink
Jan T. Groothuis
Hepke F Grupstra
Rehabilitation medicine
ARD - Amsterdam Reproduction and Development
Source :
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 33(2), 153. SAGE Publications Inc., Neurorehabilitation and neural repair, 33(2), 153-164. SAGE Publications Inc., Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 33, 2, pp. 153-164, Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 33, 153-164
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Background: Weakness caused by motor neuron degeneration in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) may result in avoidance of physical activity, resulting in deconditioning and reduced health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Objective: To study the effectiveness of aerobic exercise therapy (AET) on disease-specific and generic HRQoL in ambulatory patients with ALS. Methods: We conducted a multicenter, assessor-blinded, randomized controlled trial. Using a biphasic randomization model, ambulatory ALS patients were assigned (1:1) to AET+usual care (UC), or UC. AET consisted of a 16-week aerobic cycling exercise program. Primary outcome measures were the 40-item ALS assessment questionnaire (ALSAQ-40), and the mental component summary (MCS) and physical component summary (PCS) scores of the short-form survey (SF-36), using linear mixed effects models. Per-protocol (PP) analysis was performed for those patients who attended ≥75% of the training sessions; controls were matched (1:1) by propensity score matching. Results: Of 325 screened patients, 57 were randomized: 27 to AET+UC and 30 to UC. No significant mean slope differences between groups were observed for ALSAQ-40 (-1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI] -2.6 to 0.5, P=0.172) nor for SF-36 MCS (0.24; -0.7 to 1.1, P=0.576) or PCS (-0.51; -1.4 to 0.38, P=0.263). There were no adverse events related to the AET. PP-analyses showed significantly less deterioration in ALSAQ-40 (-1.88, -3.8 to 0.0, P=0.046) in AET+UC compared to UC. Conclusions: AET+UC was not superior to UC alone in preserving HRQoL in ambulatory ALS patient. However, the study was unfortunately underpowered, because only 10 patients completed the protocol. AET+UC may preserve disease-specific HRQoL in slow progressors. Clinical trial registration number: Netherlands National Trial Register (NTR): 1616.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
15459683
Volume :
33
Issue :
2
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Neurorehabilitation and neural repair
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....5f57dd0b48735467e1898dea6b43e608
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968319826051