Back to Search
Start Over
Assessment of patients’ self-perceived intensive care unit discomforts: Validation of the 18-item version of the IPREA
- Source :
- Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, BioMed Central, 2019, 17 (1), ⟨10.1186/s12955-019-1101-5⟩, Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, Vol 17, Iss 1, Pp 1-9 (2019), Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 2019, 17 (1), ⟨10.1186/s12955-019-1101-5⟩
- Publication Year :
- 2019
- Publisher :
- HAL CCSD, 2019.
-
Abstract
- Background and aims We reported the validation of the 18-item version of the ‘Inconforts des Patients de REAnimation (IPREA)’ questionnaire that includes 2 new items exploring feeling depressed and shortness of breath during an intensive care unit (ICU) stay. Methods The validation process was integrated in a multicenter, cluster-randomized, controlled, two-parallel group study built to assess the effectiveness of a tailored multicomponent program for reducing self-perceived discomfort in the ICU. All patients aged 18 years or older who survived an ICU stay of 3 calendar days or more were eligible for inclusion. Data collection included demographics (sex, age), type of admission (medical and surgical), health status scores at admission (Knaus score and McCabe index, Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) II), specific ICU therapeutics such as mechanical ventilation (MV), noninvasive ventilation (NIV), use of vasopressors, or renal replacement therapy (RRT), and ICU stay duration. Results A total of 994 patients were included. The initial structure of IPREA was confirmed using confirmatory factor analysis showing satisfactory fit (RMSEA at 0.042, CFI at 0.912). No multidimensional structure was identified, allowing the calculation of an overall discomfort score. The three highest discomforts were sleep deprivation, thirst, and perfusion lines and other devices, and the 3 lowest discomforts were limited visiting hours, hunger, and isolation. The overall discomfort score of the 18-item version of IPREA did not differ between men and women. Higher age was significantly correlated with a lower overall discomfort score. While MV was not linked to self-reported discomfort, patients treated by NIV reported higher overall discomfort scores than patients not treated by NIV. Conclusion The 18-item version of IPREA is easy to use and possesses satisfactory psychometric properties. The availability of a reliable and valid French questionnaire asking about patients’ self-perceived ICU discomforts enables feedback from the health care team to be incorporated in a continuous quality health care improvement strategy. Trial registration clinicaltrial.gov NCT02442934 (registration date: May 18, 2015, retrospectively registered).
- Subjects :
- Male
medicine.medical_treatment
[SDV]Life Sciences [q-bio]
law.invention
0302 clinical medicine
Quality of life
law
Surveys and Questionnaires
Health care
Validation
Medicine
030212 general & internal medicine
Simplified Acute Physiology Score
10. No inequality
[SDV.MHEP] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Human health and pathology
030503 health policy & services
General Medicine
Middle Aged
[SDV.SP]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Pharmaceutical sciences
Intensive care unit
Confirmatory factor analysis
3. Good health
[SDV] Life Sciences [q-bio]
[SDV.SP] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Pharmaceutical sciences
Intensive Care Units
lcsh:R858-859.7
Female
medicine.symptom
0305 other medical science
Discomfort
Adult
medicine.medical_specialty
Psychometrics
Critical Illness
Short Report
lcsh:Computer applications to medicine. Medical informatics
Young Adult
03 medical and health sciences
Humans
Renal replacement therapy
Aged
Retrospective Studies
Mechanical ventilation
business.industry
Questionnaire
IPREA
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Length of Stay
Respiration, Artificial
Self Concept
Sleep deprivation
Critical care
Quality of Life
Physical therapy
Self Report
business
[SDV.MHEP]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Human health and pathology
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 14777525
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, BioMed Central, 2019, 17 (1), ⟨10.1186/s12955-019-1101-5⟩, Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, Vol 17, Iss 1, Pp 1-9 (2019), Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 2019, 17 (1), ⟨10.1186/s12955-019-1101-5⟩
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....5f7b988f80232e3f5d4a17654394f7d9
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-019-1101-5⟩