Back to Search Start Over

Lactate point-of-care testing for acidosis: Cross-comparison of two devices with routine laboratory results

Authors :
Remco van Horssen
Teska N. Schuurman
Bernadette S. Jakobs
Monique J.M. de Groot
Source :
Practical Laboratory Medicine, Vol 4, Iss, Pp 41-49 (2016), Practical Laboratory Medicine
Publisher :
The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Abstract

Objectives: Lactate is a major parameter in medical decision making. During labor, it is an indicator for fetal acidosis and immediate intervention. In the Emergency Department (ED), rapid analysis of lactate/blood gas is crucial for optimal patient care. Our objectives were to cross-compare-for the first time-two point-of-care testing (POCT) lactate devices with routine laboratory results using novel tight precision targets and evaluate different lactate cut-off concentrations to predict metabolic acidosis. Design and methods: Blood samples from the delivery room (n=66) and from the ED (n=85) were analyzed on two POCT devices, the StatStrip-Lactate (Nova Biomedical) and the iSTAT-1 (CG4+ cassettes, Abbott), and compared to the routine laboratory analyzer (ABL-735, Radiometer). Lactate concentrations were cross-compared between these analyzers. Results: The StatStrip correlated well with the ABL-735 (R=0.9737) and with the iSTAT-1 (R=0.9774) for lactate in umbilical cord blood. Lactate concentrations in ED samples measured on the iSTAT-1 and ABL-735 showed a correlation coefficient of R=0.9953. Analytical imprecision was excellent for lactate and pH, while for pO2 and pCO2 the coefficient of variation was relatively high using the iSTAT-1. Conclusion: Both POCT devices showed adequate analytical performance to measure lactate. The StatStrip can indicate metabolic acidosis in 1 μl blood and will be implemented at the delivery room. Keywords: Lactate, Point-of-care testing, Blood gas, Fetal acidosis

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
23525517
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Practical Laboratory Medicine
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....60778cd586c3d591ad7baf507b9b912a
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plabm.2015.12.005