Back to Search Start Over

Validity of rotational laxity coupled with anterior translation of the knee: A cadaveric study comparing radiostereometry and the Rotab®

Authors :
Maxime L’Hermette
Fabrice Duparc
T. Rousseau
Franck Dujardin
Antoine Senioris
S Gouzy
Centre d’études des transformations des activités physiques et sportives (CETAPS)
Université de Rouen Normandie (UNIROUEN)
Normandie Université (NU)-Normandie Université (NU)-Institut de Recherche Interdisciplinaire Homme et Société (IRIHS)
Normandie Université (NU)-Normandie Université (NU)-Université de Rouen Normandie (UNIROUEN)
Normandie Université (NU)
Source :
Knee, Knee, Elsevier, 2017, 24 (2), pp.289-294. ⟨10.1016/j.knee.2017.01.009⟩
Publication Year :
2017
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2017.

Abstract

Background In current practice, anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears can be diagnosed using several devices to measure anterior tibial translation and rotational knee laxity, but these measures are never collected together. The Rotab®, which yields simultaneous measurements of anterior tibial translation and passive lower limb rotation under stress, would therefore be advantageous in current practice, but its reliability has never been tested. Aim of study To evaluate the accuracy and reliability of the Rotab® compared to the reference system, radiostereometric analysis (RSA). Methods This anatomical study was conducted on 14 lower limbs collected from fresh cadavers. Simultaneous measurements of anterior tibial translation and rotation were obtained with both systems, with antero-posterior (AP) forces of 134N and 250N using the Rotab®. Measurements were made on intact ACL and then repeated after ACL section. Variables were analyzed in univariate analysis by ANOVA, and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) between the systems was determined by the Bland and Altman method. Results The difference between the two methods for evaluating anterior tibial translation was 0.05±0.98mm at 134N and 0.29±1.04mm at 250N. The correlation between the tests was high (r 134 =r 250 =0.97, p=0.8). The difference between the two methods for rotational laxity was 0.69±2.7° at 134N and 0.5±0.6° at 250N. The Rotab® showed a significant difference only at 250N for rotational laxity after the ACL tear. Conclusion The Rotab® is a reliable device to measure rotational laxity coupled with anterior translation of the knee.

Details

ISSN :
09680160
Volume :
24
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
The Knee
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....609b8ac7ec9cb2d7e2ef98920103a93a
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2017.01.009