Back to Search
Start Over
Non-negative matrix factorization of multimodal MRI, fMRI and phenotypic data reveals differential changes in default mode subnetworks in ADHD
- Source :
- Anderson, A; Douglas, PK; Kerr, WT; Haynes, VS; Yuille, AL; Xie, J; et al.(2014). Non-negative matrix factorization of multimodal MRI, fMRI and phenotypic data reveals differential changes in default mode subnetworks in ADHD. NeuroImage, 102(P1), 207-219. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.12.015. UCLA: Retrieved from: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/9dk536sq, Anderson, A; Douglas, PK; Kerr, WT; Haynes, VS; Yuille, AL; Xie, J; et al.(2014). Non-negative matrix factorization of multimodal MRI, fMRI and phenotypic data reveals differential changes in default mode subnetworks in ADHD. NeuroImage. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.12.015. UCLA: Retrieved from: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/3h19v5dg, NeuroImage, vol 102, iss P1
- Publication Year :
- 2013
-
Abstract
- In the multimodal neuroimaging framework, data on a single subject are collected from inherently different sources such as functional MRI, structural MRI, behavioral and/or phenotypic information. The information each source provides is not independent; a subset of features from each modality maps to one or more common latent dimensions, which can be interpreted using generative models. These latent dimensions, or "topics," provide a sparse summary of the generative process behind the features for each individual. Topic modeling, an unsupervised generative model, has been used to map seemingly disparate features to a common domain. We use Non-Negative Matrix Factorization (NMF) to infer the latent structure of multimodal ADHD data containing fMRI, MRI, phenotypic and behavioral measurements. We compare four different NMF algorithms and find that the sparsest decomposition is also the most differentiating between ADHD and healthy patients. We identify dimensions that map to interpretable, recognizable dimensions such as motion, default mode network activity, and other such features of the input data. For example, structural and functional graph theory features related to default mode subnetworks clustered with the ADHD-Inattentive diagnosis. Structural measurements of the default mode network (DMN) regions such as the posterior cingulate, precuneus, and parahippocampal regions were all related to the ADHD-Inattentive diagnosis. Ventral DMN subnetworks may have more functional connections in ADHD-I, while dorsal DMN may have less. ADHD topics are dependent upon diagnostic site, suggesting diagnostic differences across geographic locations. We assess our findings in light of the ADHD-200 classification competition, and contrast our unsupervised, nominated topics with previously published supervised learning methods. Finally, we demonstrate the validity of these latent variables as biomarkers by using them for classification of ADHD in 730 patients. Cumulatively, this manuscript addresses how multimodal data in ADHD can be interpreted by latent dimensions. © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
- Subjects :
- Topic model
Male
Adolescent
Cognitive Neuroscience
Neuroimaging
Latent variable
Medical and Health Sciences
Multimodal Imaging
Article
Non-negative matrix factorization
Young Adult
Humans
Child
Default mode network
Neurology & Neurosurgery
business.industry
Psychology and Cognitive Sciences
Supervised learning
Pattern recognition
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Generative model
Phenotype
Neurology
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity
Posterior cingulate
Female
Artificial intelligence
business
Psychology
Algorithms
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 10959572
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- NeuroImage
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....61425ab785cc29cb1082c225900417cf
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.12.015.