Back to Search
Start Over
Outcome Implication of Aortic Valve Area Normalized to Body Size in Asymptomatic Aortic Stenosis
- Source :
- Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging, Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging, 2016, 9 (11), ⟨10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.116.005121⟩, CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2016, 9 (11), ⟨10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.116.005121⟩
- Publication Year :
- 2016
-
Abstract
- Background— Current guidelines define severe aortic stenosis in patients with aortic valve area normalized to body surface area (AVA/BSA) 2 /m 2 ; yet, this cutoff has never been validated. Moreover, it is not known whether AVA normalization to other body size indexes allows improved outcome prediction. We aim to test the value of AVA normalized to body size for outcome prediction in asymptomatic aortic stenosis. Methods and Results— We included 289 patients with asymptomatic aortic stenosis, preserved ejection fraction, and AVA2 at diagnosis. The outcome measure was the occurrence of aortic valve replacement or all-cause death or during follow-up. AVA was normalized to BSA, height, weight, and body mass index. For each normalized index, patients in the lowest tertile were at high risk of events whereas outcome was similar for the other tertiles. High risk of events was observed with AVA/BSA 2 /m 2 (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 3.42 [2.09–5.60]), AVA/height 2 /m (adjusted HR, 3.99 [2.42–6.60]), AVA/weight 2 /kg (adjusted HR, 3.37 [2.07–5.49]), and AVA/body mass index 2 /kg per meter square (adjusted HR, 3.23 [1.99–5.24]). Mortality risk was high with AVA/height 2 /m (adjusted HR, 2.18 [1.28–3.71]), followed by AVA/BSA 2 /m 2 (adjusted HR, 1.84 [1.09–3.11]), AVA/weight 2 /kg (adjusted HR, 1.78 [1.07–2.98]), and AVA/body mass index 2 /kg per meter square (adjusted HR, 1.75 [1.04–2.93]). AVA/height showed better predictive performance than AVA/BSA with improved reclassification and better discrimination (net reclassification improvement: 0.33 versus 0.28; integrated discrimination improvement: 0.10 versus 0.08; C statistic: 0.67 versus 0.65), whereas AVA/weight and AVA/body mass index showed lower predictive capacity. Conclusions— Among AVA normalization methods, AVA/height 2 /m followed by AVA/BSA 2 /m 2 seem as robust parameters for defining high risk in asymptomatic aortic stenosis. The prognostic value of AVA/height deserves future research.
- Subjects :
- Aortic valve
Male
Time Factors
Body Surface Area
[SDV]Life Sciences [q-bio]
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
030204 cardiovascular system & hematology
Doppler echocardiography
Severity of Illness Index
Ventricular Function, Left
Body Mass Index
0302 clinical medicine
Risk Factors
030212 general & internal medicine
Body surface area
Aged, 80 and over
Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation
medicine.diagnostic_test
Stroke volume
Middle Aged
Echocardiography, Doppler
[SDV] Life Sciences [q-bio]
medicine.anatomical_structure
Treatment Outcome
Aortic valve stenosis
Predictive value of tests
Aortic Valve
Cardiology
Female
France
medicine.symptom
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
medicine.medical_specialty
Asymptomatic
Disease-Free Survival
03 medical and health sciences
Predictive Value of Tests
Internal medicine
medicine
Humans
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging
Aged
Proportional Hazards Models
Retrospective Studies
business.industry
Body Weight
Stroke Volume
Aortic Valve Stenosis
medicine.disease
Body Height
Surgery
Stenosis
Asymptomatic Diseases
business
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 19420080 and 19419651
- Volume :
- 9
- Issue :
- 11
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....6233bea02f8efd76e5371dae89a6788a
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.116.005121⟩