Back to Search Start Over

PROSPECT guidelines update for evidence-based pain management after prostatectomy for cancer

Authors :
Adrien Lemoine
Annemijn Witdouck
Hélène Beloeil
Francis Bonnet
E. Albrecht
H. Beloeil
F. Bonnet
A Delbos
S. Freys
A. Hill
G.P. Joshi
H. Kehlet
P. Lavand’homme
P. Lirk
D Lobo
E. Pogatzki-Zahn
N. Rawal
J. Raeder
A.R. Sauter
S. Schug
M. Van De Velde
CHU Tenon [AP-HP]
Sorbonne Université (SU)-Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)
Catholic University of Leuven - Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (KU Leuven)
Centre d'Investigation Clinique [Rennes] (CIC)
Université de Rennes 1 (UR1)
Université de Rennes (UNIV-RENNES)-Université de Rennes (UNIV-RENNES)-Hôpital Pontchaillou-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)
Nutrition, Métabolismes et Cancer (NuMeCan)
Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Université de Rennes 1 (UR1)
Université de Rennes (UNIV-RENNES)-Université de Rennes (UNIV-RENNES)
PROSPECT is supported by an unrestricted grant from the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy (ESRA). In the past, PROSPECT had received unrestricted grants from Pfizer Inc. New York, NY, USA and Grunenthal, Aachen, Germany.
Jonchère, Laurent
Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Sorbonne Université (SU)
Université de Rennes (UR)-Hôpital Pontchaillou-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)
Université de Rennes (UR)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE)
Source :
Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine, Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine, Elsevier Masson, 2021, 40 (4), pp.100922. ⟨10.1016/j.accpm.2021.100922⟩, Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine, 2021, 40 (4), pp.100922. ⟨10.1016/j.accpm.2021.100922⟩
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

International audience; The aim of this review was to update the recommendations for optimal pain management after open and laparoscopic or robotic prostatectomy. Optimal pain management is known to influence postoperative recovery, but patients undergoing open radical prostatectomy typically experience moderate dynamic pain in the immediate postoperative day. Robot-assisted and laparoscopic surgery may be associated with decreased pain levels as opposed to open surgery. We performed a systematic review using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) with PROcedure SPECific Postoperative Pain ManagemenT (PROSPECT) methodology. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in the English language, from January 2015 until March 2020, assessing postoperative pain, using analgesic, anaesthetic and surgical interventions, were identified from MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Databases. Of the 1797 studies identified, 35 RCTs and 3 meta-analyses met our inclusion criteria. NSAIDs and COX-2 selective inhibitors proved to lower postoperative pain scores. Continuous intravenous lidocaine reduced postoperative pain scores during open surgery. Local wound infiltration showed positive results in open surgery. Bilateral transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block was performed at the end of surgery and lowered pain scores in robot-assisted procedures, but results were conflicting for open procedures. Basic analgesia for prostatic surgery should include paracetamol and NSAIDs or COX-2 selective inhibitors. TAP block should be recommended as the first-choice regional analgesic technique for laparoscopic/robotic radical prostatectomy. Intravenous lidocaine should be considered for open surgeries.

Details

ISSN :
23525568
Volume :
40
Issue :
4
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Anaesthesia, critical carepain medicine
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....62ad4936abce799745b3345edeaf731e
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accpm.2021.100922⟩