Back to Search Start Over

Is the Responsiveness to Light Related to the Differences in Stem Straightness among Populations of Pinus pinaster?

Authors :
Pablo Martínez-Zurimendi
Valentín Pando
Bruno Moulia
Rosario Sierra-de-Grado
University of Valladolid
El Colegio de la Frontera Sur
Laboratoire de Physique et Physiologie Intégratives de l’Arbre en environnement Fluctuant - Clermont Auvergne (PIAF)
Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-Université Clermont Auvergne (UCA)
ECOSUR Unidad Chetumal
EI Colegio de la Frontera Sur (ECOSUR)
Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología [Mexico] (CONACYT)-Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología [Mexico] (CONACYT)
Laboratoire de Physique et Physiologie Intégratives de l’Arbre en environnement Fluctuant (PIAF)
Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-Université Clermont Auvergne [2017-2020] (UCA [2017-2020])
Source :
Plants, Plants, MDPI, 2019, 8 (10), 15 p, Volume 8, Issue 10, Plants 10 (8), 15 p.. (2019), Plants, Vol 8, Iss 10, p 383 (2019), UVaDOC. Repositorio Documental de la Universidad de Valladolid, instname
Publication Year :
2019
Publisher :
HAL CCSD, 2019.

Abstract

Producción Científica<br />Stem straightness is related to wood quality and yield. Although important genetic differences in stem straightness among the natural populations of Pinus pinaster are well established, the main drivers of these differences are not well known. Since the responses of trees to light are key ecological features that induce stem curvature, we hypothesized that populations with better straightness should exhibit lower photomorphogenetic and phototropic sensitivity. We compared three populations to identify the main processes driven by primary and secondary growth that explain their differences in response to light. One-year-old seedlings were grown under two treatments—direct sunlight and lateral light plus shade—for a period of 5 months. The length and the leaning of the stems were measured weekly. The asymmetry of radial growth and compression wood (CW) formation were analyzed in cross-sections. We found differences among the populations in photomorphogenetic and phototropic reactions. However, the population with straighter stems was not characterized by reduced sensitivity to light. Photo(gravi)tropic responses driven by primary growth and gravitropic responses driven by secondary growth explained the kinetics of the stem leaning and CW pattern. Asymmetric radial growth and CW formation did not contribute to the phototropic reactions.<br />Comisión Interministerial de Ciencia y Tecnología (projects AGF97-0809 and AGL2004-07094-C02-02)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20040709 and 22237747
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Plants, Plants, MDPI, 2019, 8 (10), 15 p, Volume 8, Issue 10, Plants 10 (8), 15 p.. (2019), Plants, Vol 8, Iss 10, p 383 (2019), UVaDOC. Repositorio Documental de la Universidad de Valladolid, instname
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....62f5894edfd0e783efac5f750d5eb376