Back to Search Start Over

Solvatochromism and linear solvation energy relationship of the kinase inhibitor SKF86002

Authors :
Feng Wang
Muhammad Khattab
Madeline Van Dongen
Andrew H. A. Clayton
Source :
Spectrochimica acta. Part A, Molecular and biomolecular spectroscopy. 170
Publication Year :
2016

Abstract

We studied the spectroscopic characteristics of SKF86002, an anti-inflammatory and tyrosine kinase inhibitor drug candidate. Two conformers SKF86002A and SKF86002B are separated by energy barriers of 19.68 kJ·mol − 1 and 6.65 kJ·mol − 1 due to H-bonds, and produce the three major UV–Vis absorption bands at 325 nm, 260 nm and 210 nm in cyclohexane solutions. This environment-sensitive fluorophore exhibited emission in the 400–500 nm range with a marked response to changes in environment polarity. By using twenty-two solvents for the solvatochromism study, it was noticed that solvent polarity, represented by dielectric constant, was well correlated with the emission wavelength maxima of SKF86002. Thus, the SKF86002 fluorescence peak red shifted in aprotic solvents from 397.5 nm in cyclohexane to 436 nm in DMSO. While the emission maximum in hydrogen donating solvents ranged from 420 nm in t -butanol to 446 nm in N -methylformamide. Employing Lippert-Mataga, Bakhshiev and Kawski models, we found that one linear correlation provided a satisfactory description of polarity effect of 18 solvents on the spectral changes of SKF86002 with R 2 values 0.78, 0.80 and 0.80, respectively. Additionally, the multicomponent linear regression analysis of Kamlet-Taft ( R 2 = 0.94) revealed that solvent acidity, basicity and polarity accounted for 31%, 24% and 45% of solvent effects on SKF86002 emission, respectively. While Catalan correlation ( R 2 = 0.92) revealed that solvatochromic change of SKF86002 emission was attributed to changes in solvent dipolarity (71%), solvent polarity (12%), solvent acidity (11%) and solvent basicity (6%). Plot of Reichardt transition energies and emission energies of SKF86002 in 18 solvents showed also a linear correlation with R 2 = 0.90. The dipole moment difference between excited and ground state was calculated to be 3.4–3.5 debye.

Details

ISSN :
18733557
Volume :
170
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Spectrochimica acta. Part A, Molecular and biomolecular spectroscopy
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....63326ddc23b1c77b712a60a1b5b09dee