Back to Search Start Over

Early dark energy is not excluded by current large-scale structure data

Authors :
José Luis Bernal
Tristan L. Smith
Kimberly K. Boddy
Riccardo Murgia
Marc Kamionkowski
Vivian Poulin
Swarthmore College
Laboratoire Univers et Particules de Montpellier (LUPM)
Université Montpellier 2 - Sciences et Techniques (UM2)-Institut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des Particules du CNRS (IN2P3)-Université de Montpellier (UM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
Johns Hopkins University (JHU)
University of Texas at Austin [Austin]
TLS is supported by NSF Grant No. 2009377, NASA Grant No. 80NSSC18K0728,and the Research Corporation. This work was supported at Johns Hopkins by NSF Grant No. 1818899 and the Simons Foundation. JLB is supported by the Allan C. and Dorothy H. Davis Fellowship.
Source :
Physical Review D, Physical Review D, American Physical Society, 2021, 103 (12), pp.123542. ⟨10.1103/PhysRevD.103.123542⟩
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
HAL CCSD, 2021.

Abstract

We revisit the impact of early dark energy (EDE) on galaxy clustering using BOSS galaxy power spectra, analyzed using the effective field theory (EFT) of large-scale structure (LSS), and anisotropies of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) from Planck. Recent studies found that these data place stringent constraints on the maximum abundance of EDE allowed in the Universe. We argue here that their conclusions are a consequence of their choice of priors on the EDE parameter space, rather than any disagreement between the data and the model. For example, when considering EFT-LSS, CMB, and high-redshift supernovae data we find the EDE and $\Lambda$CDM models can provide statistically indistinguishable fits ($\Delta \chi^2 = 0.12$) with a relatively large value for the maximum fraction of energy density in the EDE ($f_{\rm ede} = 0.09$) and Hubble constant ($H_0 = 71$ km/s/Mpc) in the EDE model. Moreover, we demonstrate that the constraining power added from the inclusion of EFT-LSS traces to the potential tension between the power-spectrum amplitudes $A_s$ derived from BOSS and from Planck that arises even within the context of $\Lambda$CDM. Until this is better understood, caution should be used when interpreting EFT-BOSS+Planck constraints to models beyond $\Lambda$CDM. These findings suggest that EDE still provides a potential resolution to the Hubble tension and that it is worthwhile to test the predictions of EDE with future data-sets and further study its theoretical possibilities.<br />Comment: 8 pages, 3 figures, comments welcome

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
15507998 and 15502368
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Physical Review D, Physical Review D, American Physical Society, 2021, 103 (12), pp.123542. ⟨10.1103/PhysRevD.103.123542⟩
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....647c396e5ced47bd4be3bdab57ca6d9e
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.123542⟩