Back to Search Start Over

End of life in the critically ill patient: evaluation of experience of end of life by caregivers (EOLE study)

Authors :
Frédéric Jacobs
Jean-Paul Mira
Amira Jamoussi
Cécile Lory
Anne Renault
Jean Turc
Philippe Mateu
Cédric Daubin
Estelle Martin
Yannick Brunin
Bertrand Canoville
Jean-Claude Lacherade
Pierre Bouju
Florent Bavozet
Pierre Esnault
Fabien Lambiotte
Martial Thyrault
Sébastien Moschietto
Stephan Ehrmann
Gaëtan Plantefève
Clément Hoffmann
Mathieu Guilbart
Saber Barbar
Sebastien Jochmans
Stéphanie Houcke
Nicholas Heming
Arnaud Galbois
Bertrand Hermann
Frank Chemouni
T. Vanderlinden
Asael Berger
Laurent Poiroux
Alexandre Demoule
Alexandre Herbland
Arnaud Sement
Anne Terrier
Marc Danguy
Sami Hraeich
Pierre-Yvan Simonoviez
Elie Azoulay
Philippe Michel
Virginie Amilien
Nadia Aissaoui
David Couret
Jean-Baptiste Lascarrou
Jean Reignier
Grégoire Muller
Guillaume Louis
Lamia Ouanes-Besbes
Sami Blidi
Michael Piagnarelli
Maguelone Chalies
Florence Boissier
Gwenaëlle Jacq
Jean-Pierre Quenot
Nadiejda Antier
François Philippart
Gabriel Lejour
Atika Youssoufa
Guillaume Decormeille
David Grimaldi
Adrien Auvet
René Robert
Etienne Escudier
Jean-François Llitjos
Gaël Piton
Julien Duvivier
Nancy Kentish-Barnes
Jonathan Messika
Source :
Annals of Intensive Care, Annals of Intensive Care, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-9 (2021)
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Background The death rate in intensive care units (ICUs) can reach 20%. More than half occurs after a decision of care withholding/withdrawal. We aimed at describing and evaluating the experience of ICU physicians and nurses involved in the end-of-life (EOL) procedure. Primary objective was the evaluation of the experience of EOL assessed by the CAESAR questionnaire. Secondary objectives were to describe factors associated with a low or high score and to examine the association between Numeric Analogic Scale and quality of EOL. Methods Consecutive adult patients deceased in 52 ICUs were included between April and June 2018. Characteristics of patients and caregivers, therapeutics and care involved after withdrawal were recorded. CAESAR score included 15 items, rated from 1 (traumatic experience) to 5 (comforting experience). The sum was rated from 15 to 75 (the highest, the best experience). Numeric Analogic Scale was rated from 0 (worst EOL) to 10 (optimal EOL). Results Five hundred and ten patients were included, 403 underwent decision of care withholding/withdrawal, and among them 362 underwent effective care withdrawal. Among the 510 patients, mean CAESAR score was 55/75 (± 6) for nurses and 62/75 (± 5) for physicians (P P = 0.06). CAESAR score and Numeric Analogic Scale were significantly but weakly correlated. They were significantly higher for both nurses and physicians if the patient died after a decision of withholding/withdrawal. In multivariable analysis, among the 362 patients with effective care withdrawal, disagreement on the intensity of life support between caregivers, non-invasive ventilation and monitoring and blood tests the day of death were associated with lower score for nurses. For physicians, cardiopulmonary resuscitation the day of death was associated with lower score in multivariable analysis. Conclusion Experience of EOL was better in patients with withholding/withdrawal decision as compared to those without. Our results suggest that improvement of nurses’ participation in the end-of-life process, as well as less invasive care, would probably improve the experience of EOL for both nurses and physicians. Registration: ClinicalTrial.gov: NCT03392857.

Details

ISSN :
21105820
Volume :
11
Issue :
1
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Annals of intensive care
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....648dd9d2125e12a3e1eee89533594414