Back to Search Start Over

Correlates, Course, and Outcomes of Increased Energy in Youth with Bipolar Disorder

Authors :
Boris Birmaher
Daniel P. Dickstein
Mary Kay Gill
Heather Hower
Rasim Somer Diler
Lauren M. Weinstock
Benjamin I. Goldstein
Jeffrey Hunt
Shirley Yen
David Axelson
Martin B. Keller
Elisabeth A. Frazier
Neal D. Ryan
Tina R. Goldstein
Richard N. Jones
Michael Strober
Source :
J Affect Disord
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2020.

Abstract

Objectives Compare longitudinal trajectories of youth with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)-IV Bipolar Disorder (BD), grouped at baseline by presence/absence of increased energy during their worst lifetime mood episode (required for DSM-5). Methods Participants from the parent Course and Outcome of Bipolar Youth study (N = 446) were assessed utilizing The Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children (KSADS), KSADS Mania Rating Scale (KMRS), and KSADS Depression Rating Scale (KDRS). Youth were grouped at baseline into those with increased energy (meeting DSM-5 Criteria A for mania) vs. without increased energy (meeting DSM-IV, but not DSM-5, Criteria A for mania), for those who had worst lifetime mood episode recorded (n = 430). Youth with available longitudinal data had the presence/absence of increased energy measured, as well as psychiatric symptomatology/clinical outcomes (evaluated via the Adolescent Longitudinal Interval Follow-Up Evaluation), at each follow-up for 12.5 years (n = 398). Results At baseline, the increased energy group (based on endorsed increased energy during worst lifetime mood episode; 86% of participants) vs. the without increased energy group, were more likely to meet criteria for BD-I and BD Not Otherwise Specified, had higher KMRS/KDRS total scores, and displayed poorer family/global psychosocial functioning. However, frequency of increased energy between groups was comparable after 5 years, and no significant group differences were found on clinical/psychosocial functioning outcomes after 12.5 years. Limitations Secondary data limited study design; groupings were based on one time point. Conclusions Results indicate no clinically relevant longitudinal group differences.

Details

ISSN :
01650327
Volume :
271
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of Affective Disorders
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....64aa4c3af64dc1741b065039099c30a1