Back to Search
Start Over
Efficacy and safety of non-pharmacological and non-biological interventions
- Source :
- Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 82(1). BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP, Ortolan, A, Webers, C, Sepriano, A, Falzon, L, Baraliakos, X, Landewé, R B, Ramiro, S, van der Heijde, D & Nikiphorou, E 2022, ' Efficacy and safety of non-pharmacological and non-biological interventions : a systematic literature review informing the 2022 update of the ASAS/EULAR recommendations for the management of axial spondyloarthritis ', Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases . https://doi.org/10.1136/ard-2022-223297
- Publication Year :
- 2022
-
Abstract
- ObjectiveTo update the evidence of non-biological treatments for axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), as a basis for the 2022 Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society-European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (ASAS-EULAR) recommendations for the management of axSpA.MethodsA systematic literature review (2016–2021) on efficacy and safety of non-pharmacological and non-biological pharmacological treatments was performed, up to 1 January 2022. The research question was formulated according to the PICO format: Population: adult patients with r-axSpA and nr-axSpA; Intervention: non-pharmacological and non-biological pharmacological treatments; Comparator: active comparator or placebo; Outcomes: all relevant efficacy and safety outcomes. Type of studies included were: randomised controlled trials (RCTs), observational studies (for efficacy of non-pharmacological treatments, and safety), qualitative studies. Cohen’s effect size (ES) was calculated for non-pharmacological and risk ratio (RR) for pharmacological treatments.ResultsOf 107 publications included, 63 addressed non-pharmacological interventions, including education (n=8) and exercise (n=20). The ES for education on disease activity, function, mobility was small to moderate (eg. Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), ES: 0.06–0.59). Exercise had moderate to high ES on these outcomes (eg. BASDAI, ES: 0.14–1.43). Six RCTs on targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) showed efficacy of tofacitinib, upadacitinib and filgotinib (phase 2 only) in r-axSpA (range RR vs placebo for ASAS20: 1.91–3.10), while apremilast and nilotinib were not efficacious. Studies on conventional synthetic DMARDs (n=3), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs, n=8) and other drugs (n=12) did not provide new evidence on efficacy/safety (efficacy of NSAIDs confirmed; limited efficacy of short-term glucocorticoids in one RCT).ConclusionsEducation, exercise and NSAIDs confirmed to be efficacious in axSpA. JAKi were proved efficacious in r-axSpA.
Details
- Language :
- English
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 82(1). BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP, Ortolan, A, Webers, C, Sepriano, A, Falzon, L, Baraliakos, X, Landewé, R B, Ramiro, S, van der Heijde, D & Nikiphorou, E 2022, ' Efficacy and safety of non-pharmacological and non-biological interventions : a systematic literature review informing the 2022 update of the ASAS/EULAR recommendations for the management of axial spondyloarthritis ', Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases . https://doi.org/10.1136/ard-2022-223297
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....64d7a9b7bb99859f1fc4afa1147e88e0
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1136/ard-2022-223297