Back to Search Start Over

Primary colorectal cancer: use of kinetic modeling of dynamic contrast-enhanced CT data to predict clinical outcome

Authors :
Robert Kozarski
Quan Sing Ng
Choon Hua Thng
Tong San Koh
Vicky Goh
Jin Wei Kwek
Source :
Radiology. 267(1)
Publication Year :
2013

Abstract

To compare four different tracer kinetic models for the analysis of dynamic contrast material-enhanced computed tomographic (CT) data with respect to the prediction of 5-year overall survival in primary colorectal cancer.This study was approved by the ethical review board. Archival dynamic contrast-enhanced CT data from 46 patients with colorectal cancer, obtained as part of a research study, were analyzed retrospectively by using the distributed parameter, conventional compartmental, adiabatic tissue homogeneity, and generalized kinetic models. Blood flow, blood volume, mean transit time (MTT), permeability-surface area product, extraction fraction, extravascular extracellular volume (v(e)), and volume transfer constant (K(trans)) were compared by using the Friedman test, with statistical significance at 5%. Following receiver operating characteristic analysis, parameters of the different kinetic models and tumor stage were compared with respect to overall survival discrimination, with use of Kaplan Meier analysis and a univariate Cox proportional hazard model, with additional cross-validation and permutation testing.Blood flow was lower with the distributed parameter model than with the conventional compartmental and adiabatic tissue homogeneity models (P.0001), and blood flow values determined with the conventional compartmental and adiabatic tissue homogeneity models were similar. Conversely, MTT was longer with the distributed parameter model than with the conventional compartmental and adiabatic tissue homogeneity models (P.0001). Blood volume, permeability-surface area product, and v(e) were higher with the conventional compartmental model than with the adiabatic tissue homogeneity, distributed parameter, or generalized kinetic models (P.0001). The extraction fraction was higher with the distributed parameter model than with the adiabatic tissue homogeneity model. With respect to 5-year overall survival, only the distributed parameter model-derived v(e) was predictive of 5-year overall survival with a threshold value of 15.48 mL/100 mL after cross-validation and permutation testing.Parameter values differ significantly between models. Of the models investigated, the distributed parameter model was the best predictor of 5-year overall survival.http://radiology.rsna.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1148/radiol.12120186/-/DC1.

Details

ISSN :
15271315
Volume :
267
Issue :
1
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Radiology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....651595fb21ad2c24621f04ef6e8757fb