Back to Search Start Over

Powers of the likelihood ratio test and the correlation test using empirical bayes estimates for various shrinkages in population pharmacokinetics

Authors :
FP Combes
F. Mentre
Nicolas Frey
Sylvie Retout
Infection, Anti-microbiens, Modélisation, Evolution (IAME (UMR_S_1137 / U1137))
Université Paris 13 (UP13)-Université Paris Diderot - Paris 7 (UPD7)-Université Sorbonne Paris Cité (USPC)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)
Institut Roche de Recherche et Médecine Translationnelle
Pharma Research and Early Development
F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG
Contrat Cifre : Roche - INSERM - gouvernement Français
F. Hoffmann-La Roche [Basel]
Combes, François
Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Université Paris 13 (UP13)-Université Paris Diderot - Paris 7 (UPD7)-Université Sorbonne Paris Cité (USPC)
Source :
CPT: Pharmacometrics and Systems Pharmacology, CPT: Pharmacometrics and Systems Pharmacology, American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics ; International Society of Pharmacometrics, 2014, 3, pp.e109. ⟨10.1038/psp.2014.5⟩, CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology, CPT: Pharmacometrics and Systems Pharmacology, 2014, 3, pp.e109. ⟨10.1038/psp.2014.5⟩
Publication Year :
2014
Publisher :
HAL CCSD, 2014.

Abstract

International audience; We compared the powers of the likelihood ratio test (LRT) and the Pearson correlation test (CT) from empirical Bayes estimates (EBEs) for various designs and shrinkages in the context of nonlinear mixed-effect modeling. Clinical trial simulation was performed with a simple pharmacokinetic model with various weight (WT) effects on volume (V). Data sets were analyzed with NONMEM 7.2 using first-order conditional estimation with interaction and stochastic approximation expectation maximization algorithms. The powers of LRT and CT in detecting the link between individual WT and V or clearance were computed to explore hidden or induced correlations, respectively. Although the different designs and variabilities could be related to the large shrinkage of the EBEs, type 1 errors and powers were similar in LRT and CT in all cases. Power was mostly influenced by covariate effect size and, to a lesser extent, by the informativeness of the design. Further studies with more models are needed.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
21638306
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
CPT: Pharmacometrics and Systems Pharmacology, CPT: Pharmacometrics and Systems Pharmacology, American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics ; International Society of Pharmacometrics, 2014, 3, pp.e109. ⟨10.1038/psp.2014.5⟩, CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology, CPT: Pharmacometrics and Systems Pharmacology, 2014, 3, pp.e109. ⟨10.1038/psp.2014.5⟩
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....6561ec3cdf03c8fd6caa663029bbd590
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1038/psp.2014.5⟩