Back to Search Start Over

Figure 3 from Patterns of Oncogene Coexpression at Single-Cell Resolution Influence Survival in Lymphoma

Authors :
Anand D. Jeyasekharan
Claudio Tripodo
Siok-Bian Ng
Yen Lin Chee
Wee Joo Chng
Kasthuri Kannan
Gayatri Kumar
Jinmiao Chen
Jason J. Pitt
David W. Scott
Anja Mottok
Pedro Farinha
Daniel J. Hodson
Irina Mohorianu
Ilias Moutsopoulos
Hendrik F.P. Runge
Laura J. Gay
Alessia Bottos
Carl Harris
Hyungwon Choi
Joseph D. Khoury
Shaoying Li
Shih-Sung Chuang
Sheng-Tsung Chang
Susan Swee-Shan Hue
Soo-Yong Tan
Nicholas F. Grigoropoulos
Chandramouli Nagarajan
Soon Thye Lim
Tiffany Tang
Choon Kiat Ong
Joanne Lee
Esther Hian Li Chan
Limei Poon
Sanjay De Mel
Clementine Xin Liu
Phuong Mai Hoang
Shruti Sridhar
Yanfen Peng
Fan Shuangyi
Patrick Jaynes
Michal Marek Hoppe
Publication Year :
2023
Publisher :
American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), 2023.

Abstract

MYC, BCL2, and BCL6 protein coexpression in DLBCL can be inferred from individual marker data. A, Schematic of possible relationships between expression of three oncogenes in a population of cells. The distribution of these oncogenes can either reflect interdependent expression, independent/stochastic expression, or mutually exclusive expression. These relationships result in the percentage extent of oncogenes in the tumor being either strongly positively correlated, not correlated, or strongly negatively correlated, respectively. Created with BioRender.com. B, Correlation of MYC, BCL2, and BCL6 percentage extent across patients in DLBCL cohorts. Spearman correlation; axes are equivalent in all panels. C, Good correlation between probabilistically predicted subpopulation percentage extent based on single oncogene positivity and observed percentage extent in the NUH cohort. Cases of double-hit lymphoma (DHL, MYC+BCL2+ translocations or MYC+BCL6+ translocations) or triple-hit lymphoma (THL) are highlighted. Spearman rho for each correlation is shown; axes are equivalent in all panels. Correlation for other cohorts can be found in Supplementary Fig. S7. D, Prospective evaluation of an optimal dichotomization cutoff for M+2+6− percentage extent in the BCA cohort. Univariate Cox PH model at 1% extent positivity increment, HR for death with 95% CI. HR scale is exponential. Optimal dichotomization cutoff is highlighted in blue. E, Kaplan–Meier OS analysis of the chromogenic IHC BCA cohort evaluation stratified into M+2+6− metric high and low groups across an absolute value of 15% M+2+6−metric. Log-rank test, shading denotes 95% confidence interval. CMMC, Chi-Mei Medical Center.

Details

Database :
OpenAIRE
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....6694892f196e5834d91b4148e365eee4