Back to Search Start Over

Induction chemotherapy in head and neck cancers: Results and controversies

Authors :
Thibaut Reverdy
Andy Karabajakian
Jérôme Fayette
Eve-Marie Neidhardt
Max Gau
Centre régional de lutte contre le cancer
Source :
Oral Oncology, Oral Oncology, Elsevier, 2019, 95, pp.164-169. ⟨10.1016/j.oraloncology.2019.06.015⟩
Publication Year :
2019
Publisher :
HAL CCSD, 2019.

Abstract

Standard treatment for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LAHNSCC) consists mainly of concurrent chemoradiation (CCR) but induction chemotherapy (IC) by docetaxel-cisplatin-fluorouracil (TPF), followed by CCR, is a strong option. Comparative trials suggest that IC and CCR are equivalent, and some trials suggest superiority of IC, whereas none shows inferiority. IC might have less interest in oropharyngeal cancer (more often linked to HPV infection). When functional laryngeal preservation is the patient's priority, essays strongly suggest that IC is the best treatment. There is little data about a less toxic regimen of IC, but several schemes are promising and need to be developed. An early selection of responders to IC by metabolic imaging must be considered. Intensification attempts with cetuximab were too toxic and unsafe, but trials with immunotherapy are ongoing to enhance TPF efficacy. After IC, CCR either with cetuximab or cisplatin seems to be equally effective.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
13688375
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Oral Oncology, Oral Oncology, Elsevier, 2019, 95, pp.164-169. ⟨10.1016/j.oraloncology.2019.06.015⟩
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....669c6a1a7f945c158a39a5ece29aee20