Back to Search Start Over

European registry of carotid artery stenting: Results from a prospective registry of eight high volume EUROPEAN institutions

Authors :
Pallav Garg
Gianmarco de Donato
Giambattista Parlani
Alberto Cremonesi
Paolo Rubino
Dimitry Nikas
Carlo Setacci
Horst Sievert
Eugenio Stabile
Martin Werner
Marc Bosiers
Fausto Castriota
Marius Hornung
Piergiorgio Cao
Laura Mauri
Andrej Schmidt
Patrick Peeters
Bernhard Reimers
Stabile, Eugenio
Pallav, Garg
Alberto, Cremonesi
Marc, Bosier
Bernhard, Reimer
Carlo, Setacci
Piergiorgio, Cao
Andrej, Schmidt
Horst, Sievert
Patrick, Peeter
Dimitry, Nika
Martin, Werner
Gianmarco de, Donato
Giambattista, Parlani
Fausto, Castriota
Marius, Hornung
Laura, Mauri
Paolo, Rubino
Source :
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions. 80:329-334
Publication Year :
2012
Publisher :
Wiley, 2012.

Abstract

Background Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is the standard revascularization therapy to prevent stroke in patients with carotid artery disease. Carotid artery stenting (CAS) could be considered a potential alternative in patients at high surgical risk. Recent clinical trials have challenged this concept due a relatively high incidence of post-CAS adverse events, which occurred in low volume centers. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes associated with neuroprotected CAS in selected high volume centers. Methods From January 2007 to December 2007, 1,611 patients underwent neuroprotected CAS in eight European Centers. For each patients, clinical, procedural, and one month follow-up data from all patients have been collected. An independent clinical events committee adjudicated the events. Results Overall in hospital death was 0.06% (one patient), whereas in-hospital stroke was 0.49% (eight patients). Between hospital discharge and 30 days three additional patients died (0.18%) and 10 patients experienced a stroke (0.67%). Overall 30 days mortality was 0.24% (four patients) and stroke incidence 1.12% (18 patients). The 30 day stroke/death rate was 1.36%. Conclusions CAS is a reasonable alternative to CEA to treat carotid artery atherosclerosis in well-experienced high volume centers. These data suggest that future prospective trials comparing CAS and CEA outcomes should include only centers highly experienced in both treatment modalities. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Details

ISSN :
15221946
Volume :
80
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....670883147e1a59a6074506d087769720
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.24348