Back to Search Start Over

Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) evaluation in the REGOMA trial: A randomized, phase II clinical trial analyzing regorafenib activity in relapsed glioblastoma patients

Authors :
Roberta Rudà
Mario Caccese
Toni Ibrahim
Francesco Pasqualetti
Ivan Lolli
Giuseppe Lombardi
Vittorina Zagonel
Bruno Daniele
Andrea Pace
P. Del Bianco
G.L. De Salvo
Riccardo Soffietti
Alba A. Brandes
S. Rizzato
Marica Eoli
Marta Padovan
E. Bergo
Source :
Journal of Clinical Oncology. 37:2045-2045
Publication Year :
2019
Publisher :
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), 2019.

Abstract

Background REGOMA trial showed that regorafenib (REG) significantly improved OS and PFS in patients (pts) with relapsed GBM with respect to lomustine (LOM). REG showed a different toxicity profile compared to LOM. Here, we report final results of the HRQoL assessment, a secondary end point. Methods HRQoL was measured using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) core questionnaire (QLQ-C30) and brain module (QLQ-BN20) administered before any MRI assessments, every 8 weeks (+/- 2 weeks) until disease progression. To evaluate treatment impact on HRQoL, questionnaires at progression were excluded. Mixed-effect linear models were fitted for each of the HRQOL domain to examine the change over progression-free time within and between arms. The models included the time of questionnaire assessment, the treatment group and their interaction, as fixed effects, and a compound symmetry covariance structure for the random effects. Differences of at least 10 points were classified as a clinically meaningful change. To correct for multiple comparisons and to avoid type I error, the level of significance was set at P = 0.01 (2-sided). Results Of 119 randomized pts, 117 participated in the HRQoL evaluation, and 114 had a baseline assessment (n = 56 REG; n = 58 LOM). No statistically significant differences were observed in any generic or cancer specific domain during treatment in the REG and LOM arms, or between the two arms, except for the appetite loss scale which was significantly worse in PTS treated with REG (Global mean 14.7 (SD = 28.6) vs 7.6 (SD = 16.0); p = 0.0081). The rate of pts with a clinically meaningful worsening for appetite loss was not statistically different between the two arms (9 out of 24 and 0 out of 13 in the REG and LOM arm, respectively; p = 0.02). Conclusions In the REGOMA trial, HRQoL did not change during regorafenib treatment. Pts treated with regorafenib and lomustine reported no significant difference in HRQoL. Legal entity responsible for the study Giuseppe Lombardi. Funding Has not received any funding. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Details

ISSN :
15277755 and 0732183X
Volume :
37
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....67d6c471f625473464359e0448fd98a8
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2019.37.15_suppl.2045