Back to Search
Start Over
Perioperative and Long-Term Outcome for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Impact of Major Versus Minor Hepatectomy
- Source :
- Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos), Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC)-FCT-Sociedade da Informação, instacron:RCAAP, Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 21(11), 1841-1850. Springer New York
- Publication Year :
- 2017
- Publisher :
- Springer New York, 2017.
-
Abstract
- BACKGROUND: The objective of the current study was to investigate both short- and long-term outcomes of patients undergoing curative-intent resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) stratified by extent of hepatic resection relative to overall final pathological margin status. METHODS: One thousand twenty-three patients with ICC who underwent curative-intent resection were identified from a multi-institutional database. Demographic, clinicopathological, and operative data, as well as overall (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were compared among patients undergoing major and minor resection before and after propensity score matching. RESULTS: Overall, 608 (59.4%) patients underwent major hepatectomy, while 415 (40.6%) had a minor resection. Major hepatectomy was more frequently performed among patients who had large, multiple, and bilobar tumors. Roughly half of patients (n = 294, 48.4%) developed a postoperative complication following major hepatectomy versus only one fourth of patients (n = 113, 27.2%) after minor resection (p < 0.001). In the propensity model, patients who underwent major hepatectomy had an equivalent OS and RFS versus patients who had a minor hepatectomy (median OS, 38 vs. 37 months, p = 0.556; and median RFS, 20 vs. 18 months, p = 0.635). Patients undergoing major resection had comparable OS and RFS with wide surgical margin (≥10 and 5-9 mm), but improved RFS when surgical margin was narrow (1-4 mm) versus minor resection in the propensity model. In the Cox regression model, tumor characteristics and surgical margin were independently associated with long-term outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Major hepatectomy for ICC was not associated with an overall survival benefit, yet was associated with increased perioperative morbidity. Margin width, rather than the extent of resection, affected long-term outcomes. Radical parenchymal-sparing resection should be advocated if a margin clearance of ≥5 mm can be achieved. info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
- Subjects :
- Adult
Male
medicine.medical_specialty
Surgical margin
medicine.medical_treatment
Bile Duct Neoplasms/mortality
Cholangiocarcinoma/mortality
Cholangiocarcinoma/pathology
Outcomes
030230 surgery
Bile Duct Neoplasms/surgery
Gastroenterology
Cholangiocarcinoma
Cohort Studies
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic/surgery
Internal medicine
medicine
Hepatectomy
Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
Major
Minor
Humans
Bile Duct Neoplasms/pathology
Survival analysis
Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma
Aged
Cholangiocarcinoma/surgery
Proportional hazards model
business.industry
Postoperative complication
Perioperative
Middle Aged
HCC CIR
Survival Analysis
Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic
Treatment Outcome
Bile Duct Neoplasms
030220 oncology & carcinogenesis
Propensity score matching
Surgery
Female
business
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 18734626 and 1091255X
- Volume :
- 21
- Issue :
- 11
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....687d42b4d3798f6a46635f46538ad136