Back to Search Start Over

Access to and Use of Point-of-Care Ultrasound in the Emergency Department

Authors :
Carlos A. Camargo
Vicki E. Noble
Ali S. Raja
Jason L. Sanders
Ashley F. Sullivan
Source :
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, Vol 16, Iss 5, Pp 747-752 (2015), Sanders, Jason; Noble, Vicki E.; Raja, Ali S.; Sullivan, Ashley F.; & Camargo, Jr., Carlos A.(2015). Access to and Use of Point-of-Care Ultrasound in the Emergency Department. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, 16(5). doi: 10.5811/westjem.2015.7.27216. Retrieved from: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/3hh4v532, Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
Publication Year :
2015
Publisher :
eScholarship Publishing, University of California, 2015.

Abstract

Author(s): Sanders, Jason; Noble, Vicki E.; Raja, Ali S.; Sullivan, Ashley F.; Camargo, Jr., Carlos A. | Abstract: Introduction: Growing evidence supports emergency physician (EP)-performed point-of-care ultrasound (PoC US). However, there is a utilization gap between academic emergency departments (ED) and other emergency settings. We elucidated barriers to PoC US use in a multistate sample of predominantly non-academic EDs to inform future strategies to increase PoC US utilization, particularly in non-academic centers.Methods: In 2010, we surveyed ED directors in five states (Arkansas, Hawaii, Minnesota, Vermont, and Wyoming; n=242 EDs) about general ED characteristics. In four states we determined barriers to PoC US use, proportion of EPs using PoC US, use privileges, and whether EPs can bill for PoC US.Results: Response rates were g80% in each state. Overall, 47% of EDs reported PoC US availability. Availability varied by state, from 34% of EDs in Arkansas to 85% in Vermont. Availability was associated with higher ED visit volume, and percent of EPs who were board certified/board eligible in emergency medicine. The greatest barriers to use were limited training (70%), expense (39%), and limited need (perceived or real) (32%). When PoC US was used by EPs, 50% used it daily, 44% had privileges not requiring radiology confirmation, and 34% could bill separately for PoC US. Only 12% of EPs used it ≥80% of the time when placing central venous lines.Conclusion: Only 47% of EDs in our five-state sample of predominantly non-academic EDs had PoC US immediately available. When available, the greatest barriers to use were limited training, expense, and limited need. Recent educational and technical advancements may help overcome these barriers.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
19369018
Volume :
16
Issue :
5
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....68af4258983197122322d5d960b97f83
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2015.7.27216.