Back to Search Start Over

Applying the socio-ecological model to understand factors associated with sugar-sweetened beverage behaviours among rural Appalachian adolescents

Authors :
Maryam Yuhas
Annie L. Reid
Esther J Thatcher
Kathleen J. Porter
Wen You
Brittany A McCormick
Jamie M. Zoellner
Source :
Public Health Nutrition
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Cambridge University Press (CUP), 2021.

Abstract

Objective:The objective of the current study was to identify factors across the socio-ecological model (SEM) associated with adolescents’ sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) intake.Design:This cross-sectional study surveyed adolescents using previously validated instruments. Analyses included descriptive statistics, ANOVA tests and stepwise nonlinear regression models (i.e., two-part models) adjusted to be cluster robust. Guided by SEM, a four-step model was used to identify factors associated with adolescent SSB intake – step 1: demographics (i.e., age, gender), step 2: intrapersonal (i.e., theory of planned behaviour (attitudes, subjective norms, perceived behavioural control, behavioural intentions), health literacy, media literacy, public health literacy), step 3: interpersonal (i.e., caregiver’s SSB behaviours, caregiver’s SSB rules) and step 4: environmental (i.e., home SSB availability) level variables.Setting:Eight middle schools across four rural southwest Virginia counties in Appalachia.Participants:Seven hundred ninety seventh grade students (55·4 % female, 44·6 % males, mean age 12 (sd0·5) years).Results:Mean SSB intake was 36·3 (sd42·5) fluid ounces or 433·4 (sd493·6) calories per day. In the final step of the regression model, seven variables significantly explained adolescent’s SSB consumption: behavioural intention (P< 0·05), affective attitude (P< 0·05), perceived behavioural control (P< 0·05), health literacy (P< 0·001), caregiver behaviours (P< 0·05), caregiver rules (P< 0·05) and home availability (P< 0·001).Conclusions:SSB intake among adolescents in rural Appalachia was nearly three times above national mean. Home environment was the strongest predictor of adolescent SSB intake, followed by caregiver rules, caregiver behaviours and health literacy. Future interventions targeting these factors may provide the greatest opportunity to improve adolescent SSB intake.

Details

ISSN :
14752727 and 13689800
Volume :
24
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Public Health Nutrition
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....68f192a8a7e141f4b53f6840fb1d5f04
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1017/s1368980021000069