Back to Search Start Over

Hospital Resource Utilization Associated With Endoprosthetic Reconstruction Versus Primary Arthroplasty

Authors :
Tae Won B. Kim
Alec S Kellish
Justin C Frisby
Christopher W Hoedt
Christina J. Gutowski
Christopher Rivera-Pintado
Source :
Orthopedics. 44(1)
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Endoprosthetic reconstructions of the hip and knee are currently reimbursed as primary hip and knee arthroplasty according to Current Procedural Terminology ( CPT ) coding guidelines. The purpose of this study was to compare hospital resources consumed by patients undergoing endoprosthetic reconstruction with those consumed by patients undergoing primary arthroplasty. The authors' hypothesis was that the former group carries more comorbidities, experiences longer length of stay (LOS), and has greater resource consumption. A retrospective review was performed of 61 patients undergoing endoprosthetic reconstruction and 745 patients undergoing primary hip or knee arthroplasty between 2015 and 2018 at a single institution. Demographic, clinical, and financial data were compared. The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was used to measure patients' health status and identify comorbidities associated with prolonged LOS through linear regression analysis. Patients who underwent endoprosthetic reconstruction had a greater than 3.5 times average LOS compared with primary arthroplasty patients: 10.81 days vs 2.94 days ( P P Orthopedics . 2021;44(1):e73–e79.]

Details

ISSN :
19382367
Volume :
44
Issue :
1
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Orthopedics
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....6974e1a743624d68a51dd33306435c92