Back to Search
Start Over
Targeted Peptide Measurements in Biology and Medicine: Best Practices for Mass Spectrometry-based Assay Development Using a Fit-for-Purpose Approach
- Source :
- Molecular & Cellular Proteomics, Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP, vol 13, iss 3, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics : MCP
- Publication Year :
- 2014
- Publisher :
- Elsevier BV, 2014.
-
Abstract
- Adoption of targeted mass spectrometry (MS) approaches such as multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) to study biological and biomedical questions is well underway in the proteomics community. Successful application depends on the ability to generate reliable assays that uniquely and confidently identify target peptides in a sample. Unfortunately, there is a wide range of criteria being applied to say that an assay has been successfully developed. There is no consensus on what criteria are acceptable and little understanding of the impact of variable criteria on the quality of the results generated. Publications describing targeted MS assays for peptides frequently do not contain sufficient information for readers to establish confidence that the tests work as intended or to be able to apply the tests described in their own labs. Guidance must be developed so that targeted MS assays with established performance can be made widely distributed and applied by many labs worldwide. To begin to address the problems and their solutions, a workshop was held at the National Institutes of Health with representatives from the multiple communities developing and employing targeted MS assays. Participants discussed the analytical goals of their experiments and the experimental evidence needed to establish that the assays they develop work as intended and are achieving the required levels of performance. Using this “fit-for-purpose” approach, the group defined three tiers of assays distinguished by their performance and extent of analytical characterization. Computational and statistical tools useful for the analysis of targeted MS results were described. Participants also detailed the information that authors need to provide in their manuscripts to enable reviewers and readers to clearly understand what procedures were performed and to evaluate the reliability of the peptide or protein quantification measurements reported. This paper presents a summary of the meeting and recommendations.
- Subjects :
- Proteomics
Biochemistry & Molecular Biology
Best practice
media_common.quotation_subject
Quantitative proteomics
MEDLINE
Guidelines as Topic
Bioengineering
Bioinformatics
01 natural sciences
Biochemistry
Mass Spectrometry
Analytical Chemistry
03 medical and health sciences
Animals
Humans
Quality (business)
Biology
Molecular Biology
Reference standards
Reliability (statistics)
030304 developmental biology
media_common
0303 health sciences
Extramural
010401 analytical chemistry
Technological Innovation and Resources
Reference Standards
Data science
3. Good health
0104 chemical sciences
ComputingMethodologies_PATTERNRECOGNITION
Targeted mass spectrometry
Isotope Labeling
Medicine
Biological Assay
Generic health relevance
Peptides
Software
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 15359476
- Volume :
- 13
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....6b0aec5f9092d06f07d3cb6fbcc1e643