Back to Search Start Over

Range and Consistency of Infection Outcomes Reported in Trials Conducted in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Systematic Review

Authors :
David M. White
Eric Au
Carmel M. Hawley
David W. Johnson
Greg Knoll
Brooke M. Huuskes
Nicole M. Isbel
Ross S Francis
Samuel Chan
Camille N. Kotton
Elmi Muller
Nizam Mamode
Elaine M. Pascoe
Helio Tedesco-Silva
Bénédicte Sautenet
Andrea K. Viecelli
Scott B. Campbell
Emily A. Blumberg
Christopher Cao
Martin Wolley
Daniel C. Brennan
Jonathan C. Craig
Allison Tong
Hai An Ha Phan
Source :
Web of Science
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Background Infection remains a leading cause of death in kidney transplant recipients. This study aimed to assess the scope and consistency of infection outcomes reported in contemporary trials conducted in kidney transplant recipients. Methods A literature review of all randomized trials and trial protocols reporting infection outcomes in adult kidney transplant recipients were identified in the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Specialized Register from January 2014 to July 2019. Characteristics and infection outcomes from the trials were analyzed. Results From 102 included trials, 772 outcome measures were extracted and categorized into 216 unique measures with a median of 3.2 outcome measures per trial (range: 1 to 9). Measures were further grouped into 32 outcomes based on site of infection (14 outcomes) and organism (18 outcomes). The most commonly reported site-specific outcome and organism-specific outcome was systemic infection (71% trials) and cytomegalovirus infection (62% trials), respectively. Outcome metric and methods of aggregation included mean, median, proportion, proportional change and number of patients with at least 1 episode. Across all trials, measures were assessed at 55 different time points with a range of 1 to 11 time points per trial. Conclusions Infection outcomes in kidney transplant recipients were frequently reported by site and organism but varied widely in terms of outcome, metrics, method of aggregation and time point of measurement. Establishment of core outcomes for infection based on the shared priorities of patients/caregivers and health professionals may improve the consistency, comparability and usefulness of trial evidence.Supplemental Visual Abstract; http://links.lww.com/TP/C169.

Details

ISSN :
15346080
Volume :
105
Issue :
12
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Transplantation
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....6b7ce2f2ad443b6143a5761d24697140