Back to Search Start Over

Franken-CT: Head and Neck MR-Based Pseudo-CT Synthesis Using Diverse Anatomical Overlapping MR-CT Scans

Authors :
Javier Vera-Olmos
David Izquierdo-Garcia
Pedro Miguel Martinez-Girones
A. C. Ramos
Norberto Malpica
Mario Gil-Correa
Angel Torrado-Carvajal
Lina Garcia-Cañamaque
Source :
Applied Sciences, Volume 11, Issue 8, Applied Sciences, Vol 11, Iss 3508, p 3508 (2021)
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
MDPI AG, 2021.

Abstract

Typically, pseudo-Computerized Tomography (CT) synthesis schemes proposed in the literature rely on complete atlases acquired with the same field of view (FOV) as the input volume. However, clinical CTs are usually acquired in a reduced FOV to decrease patient ionization. In this work, we present the Franken-CT approach, showing how the use of a non-parametric atlas composed of diverse anatomical overlapping Magnetic Resonance (MR)-CT scans and deep learning methods based on the U-net architecture enable synthesizing extended head and neck pseudo-CTs. Visual inspection of the results shows the high quality of the pseudo-CT and the robustness of the method, which is able to capture the details of the bone contours despite synthesizing the resulting image from knowledge obtained from images acquired with a completely different FOV. The experimental Zero-Normalized Cross-Correlation (ZNCC) reports a 0.9367 ± 0.0138 (mean ± SD) and 95% confidence interval (0.9221, 0.9512)<br />the experimental Mean Absolute Error (MAE) reports 73.9149 ± 9.2101 HU and 95% confidence interval (66.3383, 81.4915)<br />the Structural Similarity Index Measure (SSIM) reports 0.9943 ± 0.0009 and 95% confidence interval (0.9935, 0.9951)<br />and the experimental Dice coefficient for bone tissue reports 0.7051 ± 0.1126 and 95% confidence interval (0.6125, 0.7977). The voxel-by-voxel correlation plot shows an excellent correlation between pseudo-CT and ground-truth CT Hounsfield Units (m = 0.87<br />adjusted R2 = 0.91<br />p &lt<br />0.001). The Bland–Altman plot shows that the average of the differences is low (−38.6471 ± 199.6100<br />95% CI (−429.8827, 352.5884)). This work serves as a proof of concept to demonstrate the great potential of deep learning methods for pseudo-CT synthesis and their great potential using real clinical datasets.

Details

ISSN :
20763417
Volume :
11
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Applied Sciences
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....6c938b2d7b26d64eccb89ed408bf8066
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3390/app11083508