Back to Search Start Over

The utility of ESR, CRP and platelets in the diagnosis of GCA

Authors :
Fiona Li Ying Chan
Christopher Hill
Samuel L Whittle
Susan C. Lester
Source :
BMC Rheumatology, Vol 3, Iss 1, Pp 1-7 (2019), BMC Rheumatology
Publication Year :
2019
Publisher :
Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2019.

Abstract

Background To compare the utility of ESR, CRP and platelets for the diagnosis of GCA. Method A clinical diagnosis of GCA was determined by case-note review of 270 individuals (68% female, mean age 72 years) referred to a central pathology service for a temporal artery biopsy between 2011 and 2014. The highest levels of ESR, CRP and platelets (within 2 weeks of diagnosis) were documented. Evaluation of ESR, CRP and platelets for the diagnosis of GCA were compared using Receiver Operating Characteristic Area Under the Curve (ROC-AUC), and sensitivity/specificity at optimum cut-off values. Results GCA was clinically diagnosed in 139 (67%) patients, with 81 TAB positive. The AUC estimates for ESR, CRP and platelets were comparable (0.65 vs 0.72 vs 0.72, p = 0.08). The estimated optimal cut-off levels were confirmed at 50 mm/hour for ESR, and determined as 20 mg/L for CRP and 300 × 109/L for platelets. Sensitivity estimates for these three tests were comparable (p = 0.45) and ranged between 66% for ESR and 71% for platelets. Specificity estimates were also comparable (p = 0.11) and ranged between 57% for ESR and 68% for CRP. There was only moderate agreement between the three positive tests (agreement 67%, kappa: 0.34), and when considered collectively, CRP and platelet positive tests were independent predictors of GCA (p

Details

ISSN :
25201026
Volume :
3
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
BMC Rheumatology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....6ccad92d59598e02476c0f4cb751a079
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41927-019-0061-z