Back to Search
Start Over
Global difficulty modulates the prioritization strategy in multitasking situations
- Source :
- Applied Ergonomics, Applied Ergonomics, Elsevier, 2019, 80, pp.1-8. ⟨10.1016/j.apergo.2019.04.012⟩
- Publication Year :
- 2019
- Publisher :
- Elsevier BV, 2019.
-
Abstract
- International audience; There has been a considerable amount of research to conceptualize how cognition handle multitasking situations. Despite these efforts, it is still not clear how task parameters shape attentionnal resources allocation. For instance, many research have suggested that difficulty levels could explain these conflicting observations and very few have considered other factors such as task importance. In the present study, twenty participants had to carry out two N-Back tasks simultaneously, each subtask having distinct difficulty (0,1 or 2-Back) and importance (1 or 3 points) levels. Participants's cumulative dwell time were collected to assess their attentional strategies. Results showed that depending on the global level of difficulty (combination of the two levels of difficulty), attentional resources of people were driven either by the subtask difficulty (under low-global-difficulty) or the subtask importance (under high-global-difficulty), in a non-compensatory way. We discussed these results in terms of decision-making heuristics and metacognition.
- Subjects :
- Male
Prioritization
Computer science
Decision Making
Metacognition
Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
Human Factors and Ergonomics
Task (project management)
Young Adult
03 medical and health sciences
Cognition
0302 clinical medicine
Task Performance and Analysis
Humans
Human multitasking
Attention
0501 psychology and cognitive sciences
Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
Engineering (miscellaneous)
050107 human factors
Working memory
Attentional processes
05 social sciences
Neurosciences
Multitasking Behavior
Dual task
030210 environmental & occupational health
Psychologie
[SCCO.PSYC]Cognitive science/Psychology
Female
Heuristics
Decision-making
Cognitive psychology
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 00036870
- Volume :
- 80
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Applied Ergonomics
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....6d229aec8d127c13f80f9f6c472873b9
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2019.04.012