Back to Search Start Over

Global difficulty modulates the prioritization strategy in multitasking situations

Authors :
Sébastien Scannella
Frédéric Dehais
Benoît Valéry
Nadine Matton
Institut Supérieur de l'Aéronautique et de l'Espace (ISAE-SUPAERO)
Sciences de la Cognition, Technologie, Ergonomie (SCoTE)
Institut national universitaire Champollion [Albi] (INUC)
Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées
ENAC - Programme transverse IHM Aéronautique (IHM Aero)
Ecole Nationale de l'Aviation Civile (ENAC)
Département Conception et conduite des véhicules Aéronautiques et Spatiaux (DCAS)
Département de Mathématiques, Informatique, Automatique (DMIA)
This research was supported by a DGA-MRIS (French Defense Procurement Agency) scholarship.
Ecole Nationale de l'Aviation Civile - ENAC (FRANCE)
Institut Supérieur de l'Aéronautique et de l'Espace - ISAE-SUPAERO (FRANCE)
Institut National Universitaire Champollion - INU (FRANCE)
Source :
Applied Ergonomics, Applied Ergonomics, Elsevier, 2019, 80, pp.1-8. ⟨10.1016/j.apergo.2019.04.012⟩
Publication Year :
2019
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2019.

Abstract

International audience; There has been a considerable amount of research to conceptualize how cognition handle multitasking situations. Despite these efforts, it is still not clear how task parameters shape attentionnal resources allocation. For instance, many research have suggested that difficulty levels could explain these conflicting observations and very few have considered other factors such as task importance. In the present study, twenty participants had to carry out two N-Back tasks simultaneously, each subtask having distinct difficulty (0,1 or 2-Back) and importance (1 or 3 points) levels. Participants's cumulative dwell time were collected to assess their attentional strategies. Results showed that depending on the global level of difficulty (combination of the two levels of difficulty), attentional resources of people were driven either by the subtask difficulty (under low-global-difficulty) or the subtask importance (under high-global-difficulty), in a non-compensatory way. We discussed these results in terms of decision-making heuristics and metacognition.

Details

ISSN :
00036870
Volume :
80
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Applied Ergonomics
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....6d229aec8d127c13f80f9f6c472873b9
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2019.04.012