Back to Search Start Over

TRACEBACK: Testing of Historical Tubo-Ovarian Cancer Patients for Hereditary Risk Genes as a Cancer Prevention Strategy in Family Members

Authors :
Rachel, Delahunty
Linh, Nguyen
Stuart, Craig
Belinda, Creighton
Dinuka, Ariyaratne
Dale W, Garsed
Elizabeth, Christie
Sian, Fereday
Lesley, Andrews
Alexandra, Lewis
Sharne, Limb
Ahwan, Pandey
Joy, Hendley
Nadia, Traficante
Natalia, Carvajal
Amanda B, Spurdle
Bryony, Thompson
Michael T, Parsons
Victoria, Beshay
Mila, Volcheck
Timothy, Semple
Richard, Lupat
Kenneth, Doig
Jiaan, Yu
Xiao Qing, Chen
Anna, Marsh
Christopher, Love
Sanela, Bilic
Maria, Beilin
Cassandra B, Nichols
Christina, Greer
Yeh Chen, Lee
Susan, Gerty
Lynette, Gill
Emma, Newton
Julie, Howard
Rachel, Williams
Christie, Norris
Andrew N, Stephens
Erin, Tutty
Courtney, Smyth
Shona, O'Connell
Thomas, Jobling
Colin J R, Stewart
Adeline, Tan
Stephen B, Fox
Nicholas, Pachter
Jason, Li
Jason, Ellul
Gisela, Mir Arnau
Mary-Anne, Young
Louisa, Gordon
Laura, Forrest
Marion, Harris
Karen, Livingstone
Jane, Hill
Georgia, Chenevix-Trench
Paul A, Cohen
Penelope M, Webb
Michael, Friedlander
Paul, James
David, Bowtell
Kathryn, Alsop
Source :
Journal of Clinical Oncology. 40:2036-2047
Publication Year :
2022
Publisher :
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), 2022.

Abstract

PURPOSE Tubo-ovarian cancer (TOC) is a sentinel cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variants (PVs). Identification of a PV in the first member of a family at increased genetic risk (the proband) provides opportunities for cancer prevention in other at-risk family members. Although Australian testing rates are now high, PVs in patients with TOC whose diagnosis predated revised testing guidelines might have been missed. We assessed the feasibility of detecting PVs in this population to enable genetic risk reduction in relatives. PATIENTS AND METHODS In this pilot study, deceased probands were ascertained from research cohort studies, identification by a relative, and gynecologic oncology clinics. DNA was extracted from archival tissue or stored blood for panel sequencing of 10 risk-associated genes. Testing of deceased probands ascertained through clinic records was performed with a consent waiver. RESULTS We identified 85 PVs in 84 of 787 (11%) probands. Familial contacts of 39 of 60 (65%) deceased probands with an identified recipient (60 of 84; 71%) have received a written notification of results, with follow-up verbal contact made in 85% (33 of 39). A minority of families (n = 4) were already aware of the PV. For many (29 of 33; 88%), the genetic result provided new information and referral to a genetic service was accepted in most cases (66%; 19 of 29). Those who declined referral (4 of 29) were all male next of kin whose family member had died more than 10 years before. CONCLUSION We overcame ethical and logistic challenges to demonstrate that retrospective genetic testing to identify PVs in previously untested deceased probands with TOC is feasible. Understanding reasons for a family member's decision to accept or decline a referral will be important for guiding future TRACEBACK projects.

Details

ISSN :
15277755 and 0732183X
Volume :
40
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....6d66ca017250ec5b60c0dd8770470563