Back to Search
Start Over
Do free caesarean section policies increase inequalities in Benin and Mali?
- Source :
- International Journal for Equity in Health, International Journal for Equity in Health, BioMed Central, 2018, 17 (1), ⟨10.1186/s12939-018-0789-x⟩, International Journal for Equity in Health, BioMed Central, 2018, 17 (1), 〈10.1186/s12939-018-0789-x〉, International Journal for Equity in Health, Vol 17, Iss 1, Pp 1-12 (2018), International Journal for Equity in Health, 2018, 17 (1), ⟨10.1186/s12939-018-0789-x⟩
- Publication Year :
- 2018
- Publisher :
- HAL CCSD, 2018.
-
Abstract
- Background Benin and Mali introduced user fee exemption policies focused on caesarean sections (C-sections) in 2005 and 2009, respectively. These policies had a positive impact on access to C-sections and facility based deliveries among all women, but the impact on socioeconomic inequality is still highly uncertain. The objective of this study was to observe whether there was an increase or a decrease in urban/rural and socioeconomic inequalities in access to C-sections and facility based deliveries after the free C-section policy was introduced. Methods We used data from three consecutive Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS): 2001, 2006 and 2011–2012 in Benin and 2001, 2006 and 2012–13 in Mali. We evaluated trends in inequality in terms of two outcomes: C-sections and facility based deliveries. Adjusted odds ratios were used to estimate whether the distributions of C-sections and facility based deliveries favoured the least advantaged categories (rural, non-educated and poorest women) or the most advantaged categories (urban, educated and richest women). Concentration curves were used to observe the degree of wealth-related inequality in access to C-sections and facility based deliveries. Results We analysed 47,302 childbirths (23,266 in Benin and 24,036 in Mali). In Benin, we found no significant difference in access to C-sections between urban and rural women or between educated and non-educated women. However, the richest women had greater access to C-sections than the poorest women. There was no significant change in these inequalities in terms of access to C-sections and facility based deliveries after introduction of the free C-section policy. In Mali, we found a reduction in education-related inequalities in access to C-sections after implementation of the policy (p-value = 0.043). Inequalities between urban and rural areas had already decreased prior to implementation of the policy, but wealth-related inequalities were still present. Conclusions Urban/rural and socioeconomic inequalities in C-section access did not change substantially after the countries implemented free C-section policies. User fee exemption is not enough. We recommend switching to mechanisms that combine both a universal approach and targeted action for vulnerable populations to address this issue and ensure equal health care access for all individuals.
- Subjects :
- Rural Population
Urban Population
Mali
Health Services Accessibility
0302 clinical medicine
Pregnancy
Health care
[ SHS.ECO ] Humanities and Social Sciences/Economies and finances
Benin
Caesarean section
030212 general & internal medicine
10. No inequality
Socioeconomics
Social policy
media_common
lcsh:Public aspects of medicine
1. No poverty
Middle Aged
[SHS.ECO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and Finance
Health equity
Health policy
3. Good health
Low-income countries
Geography
Educational Status
Female
0305 other medical science
Adult
Inequality
Adolescent
media_common.quotation_subject
Developing country
User fee
03 medical and health sciences
Young Adult
Humans
Healthcare Disparities
Poverty
030505 public health
business.industry
Cesarean Section
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Parturition
lcsh:RA1-1270
Delivery, Obstetric
Social Class
Socioeconomic Factors
Fees and Charges
Maternal health
Rural area
Health Expenditures
business
User fees
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 14759276
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- International Journal for Equity in Health, International Journal for Equity in Health, BioMed Central, 2018, 17 (1), ⟨10.1186/s12939-018-0789-x⟩, International Journal for Equity in Health, BioMed Central, 2018, 17 (1), 〈10.1186/s12939-018-0789-x〉, International Journal for Equity in Health, Vol 17, Iss 1, Pp 1-12 (2018), International Journal for Equity in Health, 2018, 17 (1), ⟨10.1186/s12939-018-0789-x⟩
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....6f5f2ae7cb7cffcb6344df5e92c215a5
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-018-0789-x⟩