Back to Search Start Over

Updating of aversive memories after temporal error detection is differentially modulated by mTOR across development

Authors :
Kira Wood
Regina M. Sullivan
Joseph E. LeDoux
Anne Marie Mouly
Lucille Tallot
Lorenzo Diaz-Mataix
Valérie Doyère
Rosemarie E. Perry
Institut des Neurosciences Paris-Saclay (NeuroPSI)
Université Paris-Sud - Paris 11 (UP11)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
New York University School of Medicine
NYU System (NYU)
New York University Langone Medical Center (NYU Langone Medical Center)
Centre de recherche en neurosciences de Lyon (CRNL)
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (UCBL)
Université de Lyon-Université de Lyon-Université Jean Monnet [Saint-Étienne] (UJM)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
Source :
Learning and Memory, Learning and Memory, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 2017, 24 (3), pp.115-122. ⟨10.1101/lm.043083.116⟩
Publication Year :
2017
Publisher :
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, 2017.

Abstract

International audience; The updating of a memory is triggered whenever it is reactivated and a mismatch from what is expected (i.e., prediction error) is detected, a process that can be unraveled through the memory's sensitivity to protein synthesis inhibitors (i.e., reconsolidation). As noted in previous studies, in Pavlovian threat/aversive conditioning in adult rats, prediction error detection and its associated protein synthesis-dependent reconsolidation can be triggered by reactivating the memory with the conditioned stimulus (CS), but without the unconditioned stimulus (US), or by presenting a CS-US pairing with a different CS-US interval than during the initial learning. Whether similar mechanisms underlie memory updating in the young is not known. Using similar paradigms with rapamycin (an mTORC1 inhibitor), we show that preweaning rats (PN18-20) do form a long-term memory of the CS-US interval, and detect a 10-sec versus 30-sec temporal prediction error. However, the resulting updating/reconsolidation processes become adult-like after adolescence (PN30-40). Our results thus show that while temporal prediction error detection exists in preweaning rats, specific infant-type mechanisms are at play for associative learning and memory.

Details

ISSN :
15495485 and 10720502
Volume :
24
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Learning & Memory
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....6f662181ba89884d0f38cab29c67e859
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1101/lm.043083.116