Back to Search Start Over

Comparison of non-myeloablative conditioning regimens for lymphoproliferative disorders

Authors :
Brent R. Logan
Marcelo C. Pasquini
Jennifer Le-Rademacher
Andrew S. Artz
Sanghee Hong
Philip L. McCarthy
Source :
Bone marrow transplantation
Publication Year :
2014
Publisher :
Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2014.

Abstract

Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) with non-myeloablative conditioning (NMA) for lymphoproliferative diseases (LD) includes fludarabine with and without low-dose total body irradiation (TBI). Transplant outcomes were compared among patients ≥40 years with LD who received a HCT with TBI (N=382) and no-TBI (N=515) NMA from 2001 to 2011. The groups were comparable except for donor, graft, prophylaxis for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), disease status and year of HCT. Cumulative incidences of grades II–IV GVHD at 100 days, were 29% and 20% (p=0.001), and chronic GVHD at 1 year were 54% and 44% (p=0.004) for TBI and no-TBI, respectively. Multivariate analysis of progression/relapse, treatment failure and mortality showed no outcome differences by conditioning. Full donor chimerism at day 100 was observed in 82% vs. 64% in the TBI and no-TBI groups, respectively (p=0.006). Subset of four most common conditioning/ GVHD prophylaxis combinations demonstrated higher rates of grades II–IV acute (p

Details

ISSN :
14765365 and 02683369
Volume :
50
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Bone Marrow Transplantation
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....6f703015d4f8a70c0f3e479448b540b6
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2014.269