Back to Search Start Over

Cross comparison and prognostic assessment of breast cancer multigene signatures in a large population-based contemporary clinical series

Authors :
Cecilia Hegardt
Lao H. Saal
Henrik Lindman
Anna Ehinger
Niklas Loman
Lisa Rydén
Jari Häkkinen
Johan Staaf
Johan Vallon-Christersson
Tobias Sjöblom
Åke Borg
Martin Malmberg
Helena Olofsson
Fredrik Wärnberg
Christer Larsson
Source :
Scientific Reports, Scientific Reports, Vol 9, Iss 1, Pp 1-16 (2019)
Publication Year :
2019
Publisher :
Uppsala universitet, Experimentell och klinisk onkologi, 2019.

Abstract

Multigene expression signatures provide a molecular subdivision of early breast cancer associated with patient outcome. A gap remains in the validation of such signatures in clinical treatment groups of patients within population-based cohorts of unselected primary breast cancer representing contemporary disease stages and current treatments. A cohort of 3520 resectable breast cancers with RNA sequencing data included in the population-based SCAN-B initiative (ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT02306096) were selected from a healthcare background population of 8587 patients diagnosed within the years 2010–2015. RNA profiles were classified according to 19 reported gene signatures including both gene expression subtypes (e.g. PAM50, IC10, CIT) and risk predictors (e.g. Oncotype DX, 70-gene, ROR). Classifications were analyzed in nine adjuvant clinical assessment groups: TNBC-ACT (adjuvant chemotherapy, n = 239), TNBC-untreated (n = 82), HER2+/ER− with anti-HER2+ ACT treatment (n = 110), HER2+/ER+ with anti-HER2 + ACT + endocrine treatment (n = 239), ER+/HER2−/LN− with endocrine treatment (n = 1113), ER+/HER2−/LN− with endocrine + ACT treatment (n = 243), ER+/HER2−/LN+ with endocrine treatment (n = 423), ER+/HER2−/LN+ with endocrine + ACT treatment (n = 433), and ER+/HER2−/LN− untreated (n = 200). Gene signature classification (e.g., proportion low-, high-risk) was generally well aligned with stratification based on current immunohistochemistry-based clinical practice. Most signatures did not provide any further risk stratification in TNBC and HER2+/ER– disease. Risk classifier agreement (low-, medium/intermediate-, high-risk groups) in ER+ assessment groups was on average 50–60% with occasional pair-wise comparisons having

Details

Language :
English
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Scientific Reports, Scientific Reports, Vol 9, Iss 1, Pp 1-16 (2019)
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....701bec1df2c5b7dfded55b4d9db66239