Back to Search
Start Over
Quality of Life: A Prospective Randomized Trial of Palliative Volumetric Arc Therapy Versus 3-Dimensional Conventional Radiation Therapy
- Source :
- International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics. 109(5)
- Publication Year :
- 2020
-
Abstract
- Purpose Volumetric arc therapy (VMAT) is a radiation therapy (RT) technique that spares normal tissues from high and intermediate RT doses but increases the volume of tissues receiving low doses of RT compared with 3-dimensional conformal RT (3DCRT). We hypothesized that palliative VMAT would reduce the detriment to patient quality of life (QOL) compared with palliative 3DCRT. Methods and Materials This phase 2 trial randomized patients to palliative RT using VMAT or 3DCRT to 1 painful site of metastatic disease in the trunk. Treating physicians could choose 8 Gy in 1 fraction or 20 Gy in 5 fractions to stratify randomization. The primary endpoint was the change in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Version 3.0 (EORTC QLQ-C30) global health status QOL subscale at 1 week after RT. Repeated measures analysis of variance was used to assess the relationship of patient QOL over time with other factors. Results From July 2014 to November 2017, 37 patients who underwent 3DCRT and 32 patients who underwent VMAT were randomized into the study. Median overall survival was 9 months. Overall pain responses to RT were equivalent (P = .53) between the techniques. Patient compliance in returning QOL questionnaires was 94%, 81%, and 69% at baseline, 1 week after RT, and 1 month after RT, respectively. At 1 week after RT, change in global QOL was not significantly (P = .31) different between VMAT versus 3DCRT. At 4 weeks after RT, VMAT induced significantly (P = .049) less global QOL deterioration than 3DCRT did. Patients who underwent VMAT maintained better physical (P = .012), role (P = .041), and social (P = .025) functioning, but they reported more diarrhea symptoms (P = .017) than in the 3DCRT group. Conclusions Palliative VMAT and 3DCRT did not differ in their ability to control pain; however, palliative VMAT induced fewer QOL detriments than 3DCRT did at 4 weeks after RT.
- Subjects :
- Diarrhea
Male
Organs at Risk
Cancer Research
medicine.medical_specialty
Randomization
medicine.medical_treatment
Health Status
030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging
law.invention
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
Randomized controlled trial
Quality of life
law
Internal medicine
medicine
Clinical endpoint
Humans
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging
Prospective Studies
Karnofsky Performance Status
Aged
Volumetric arc therapy
Analysis of Variance
Radiation
business.industry
Palliative Care
Repeated measures design
Cancer
Nausea
Radiotherapy Dosage
Cancer Pain
Middle Aged
medicine.disease
Health Surveys
humanities
Radiation therapy
Oncology
030220 oncology & carcinogenesis
Quality of Life
Female
Dose Fractionation, Radiation
Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated
Radiotherapy, Conformal
business
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 1879355X
- Volume :
- 109
- Issue :
- 5
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....714ac201812b53f69936e2dc62159cdf