Back to Search Start Over

Long-term evolution of multiple sclerosis disability in the treatment era

Authors :
Bruce A C, Cree
Pierre-Antoine, Gourraud
Jorge R, Oksenberg
Carolyn, Bevan
Elizabeth, Crabtree-Hartman
Jeffrey M, Gelfand
Douglas S, Goodin
Jennifer, Graves
Ari J, Green
Ellen, Mowry
Darin T, Okuda
Daniel, Pelletier
H-Christian, von Büdingen
Scott S, Zamvil
Alisha, Agrawal
Stacy, Caillier
Caroline, Ciocca
Refujia, Gomez
Rachel, Kanner
Robin, Lincoln
Antoine, Lizee
Pamela, Qualley
Adam, Santaniello
Leena, Suleiman
Monica, Bucci
Valentina, Panara
Nico, Papinutto
William A, Stern
Alyssa H, Zhu
Gary R, Cutter
Sergio, Baranzini
Roland G, Henry
Stephen L, Hauser
Source :
Annals of Neurology
Publication Year :
2015

Abstract

Objective To characterize the accrual of long‐term disability in a cohort of actively treated multiple sclerosis (MS) patients and to assess whether clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data used in clinical trials have long‐term prognostic value. Methods This is a prospective study of 517 actively managed MS patients enrolled at a single center. Results More than 91% of patients were retained, with data ascertained up to 10 years after the baseline visit. At this last assessment, neurologic disability as measured by the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) was stable or improved compared to baseline in 41% of patients. Subjects with no evidence of disease activity (NEDA) by clinical and MRI criteria during the first 2 years had long‐term outcomes that were no different from those of the cohort as a whole. 25‐OH vitamin D serum levels were inversely associated with short‐term MS disease activity; however, these levels had no association with long‐term disability. At a median time of 16.8 years after disease onset, 10.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 7.2–14%) of patients reached an EDSS ≥ 6, and 18.1% (95% CI = 13.5–22.5%) evolved from relapsing MS to secondary progressive MS (SPMS). Interpretation Rates of worsening and evolution to SPMS were substantially lower when compared to earlier natural history studies. Notably, the NEDA 2‐year endpoint was not a predictor of long‐term stability. Finally, the data call into question the utility of annual MRI assessments as a treat‐to‐target approach for MS care. Ann Neurol 2016;80:499–510

Details

ISSN :
15318249
Volume :
80
Issue :
4
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Annals of neurology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....73cff46e688bcc50e28a7735b32ba7e7