Back to Search Start Over

Abatacept for Treatment of Adults Hospitalized with Moderate or Severe Covid-19

Authors :
Ko, Emily R.
Anstrom, Kevin J.
Panettieri, Reynold A.
Lachiewicz, Anne M.
Maillo, Martin
O’Halloran, Jane A.
Boucher, Cynthia
Smith, P. Brian
McCarthy, Matthew W.
Segura Nunez, Patricia
Mendivil Tuchia de Tai, Sabina
Khan, Akram
Mena Lora, Alfredo J.
Salathe, Matthias
Kedar, Eyal
Capo, Gerardo
Rodríguez Gonzalez, Daniel
Patterson, Thomas F.
Palma, Christopher
Ariza, Horacio
Patelli Lima, Maria
Blamoun, John
Nannini, Esteban C.
Sprinz, Eduardo
Mykietiuk, Analia
Wang, Jennifer P.
Parra-Rodriguez, Luis
Der, Tatyana
Willsey, Kate
Benjamin, Daniel K.
Wen, Jun
Zakroysky, Pearl
Halabi, Susan
Silverstein, Adam
McNulty, Steven E.
O’Brien, Sean M.
Al-Khalidi, Hussein R.
Butler, Sandra
Atkinson, Jane
Adam, Stacey J.
Chang, Soju
Maldonado, Michael A.
Proscham, Michael
LaVange, Lisa
Bozzette, Samuel A.
Powderly, William G.
Source :
medRxiv
Publication Year :
2022
Publisher :
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, 2022.

Abstract

BackgroundWe investigated whether abatacept, a selective costimulation modulator, provides additional benefit when added to standard-of-care for patients hospitalized with Covid-19.MethodsWe conducted a master protocol to investigate immunomodulators for potential benefit treating patients hospitalized with Covid-19 and report results for abatacept. Intravenous abatacept (one-time dose 10 mg/kg, maximum dose 1000 mg) plus standard of care (SOC) was compared with shared placebo plus SOC. Primary outcome was time-to-recovery by day 28. Key secondary endpoints included 28-day mortality.ResultsBetween October 16, 2020 and December 31, 2021, a total of 1019 participants received study treatment (509 abatacept; 510 shared placebo), constituting the modified intention-to-treat cohort. Participants had a mean age 54.8 (SD 14.6) years, 60.5% were male, 44.2% Hispanic/Latino and 13.7% Black. No statistically significant difference for the primary endpoint of time-to-recovery was found with a recovery-rate-ratio of 1.14 (95% CI 1.00–1.29; p=0.057) compared with placebo. We observed a substantial improvement in 28-day all-cause mortality with abatacept versus placebo (11.0% vs. 15.1%; odds ratio [OR] 0.62 [95% CI 0.41– 0.94]), leading to 38% lower odds of dying. Improvement in mortality occurred for participants requiring oxygen/noninvasive ventilation at randomization. Subgroup analysis identified the strongest effect in those with baseline C-reactive protein >75mg/L. We found no statistically significant differences in adverse events, with safety composite index slightly favoring abatacept. Rates of secondary infections were similar (16.1% for abatacept; 14.3% for placebo).ConclusionsAddition of single-dose intravenous abatacept to standard-of-care demonstrated no statistically significant change in time-to-recovery, but improved 28-day mortality.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov(NCT04593940).

Subjects

Subjects :
Article

Details

Language :
English
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
medRxiv
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....73d45f03a7e17cd174adb42a8ffda67d