Back to Search Start Over

Postoperative Chemotherapy Bladder Instillation After Radical Nephroureterectomy: Results of a European Survey from the Young Academic Urologist Urothelial Cancer Group

Authors :
Florian Roghmann
Friedrich-Carl von Rundstedt
Wojciech Krajewski
Tom-Régis Dobé
Kees Hendricksen
Ettore Di Trapani
Evanguelos Xylinas
Malte W. Vetterlein
Francesco Soria
Paul Sargos
Andrea Necchi
Gianluigi Califano
Roland Seiler
Aidan P. Noon
Cédric Poyet
Benjamin Pradere
Simone Albisinni
Michael Rink
Idir Ouzaid
Andrea Mari
Atiqullah Aziz
Marco Moschini
Dobe, T. -R.
Califano, G.
von Rundstedt, F. -C.
Ouzaid, I.
Albisinni, S.
Aziz, A.
Di Trapani, E.
Hendricksen, K.
Krajewski, W.
Mari, A.
Moschini, M.
Necchi, A.
Noon, A. P.
Poyet, C.
Pradere, B.
Rink, M.
Roghmann, F.
Sargos, P.
Seiler, R.
Soria, F.
Vetterlein, M. W.
Xylinas, E.
University of Naples Federico II
European Institute of Oncology [Milan] (ESMO)
Fondazione Ospedale San Camillo [Venezia] (IRCCS)
Universitaetsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf = University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf [Hamburg] (UKE)
University of Zurich
Xylinas, Evanguelos
Source :
European Urology Open Science, European Urology Open Science, Elsevier, 2020, 22, pp.45-50. ⟨10.1016/j.euros.2020.10.003⟩, European Urology Open Science, 22, European Urology Open Science, Vol 22, Iss, Pp 45-50 (2020)
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
Elsevier B.V., 2020.

Abstract

Background: Level 1 evidence supports the administration of single postoperative intravesical chemotherapy (pIVC) following radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), in order to decrease intravesical recurrence risk. Objective: The Young Academic Urologist Urothelial Cancer Group aimed to investigate the use of pIVC in daily practice among European colleagues. Design, setting, and participants: An online survey was shared with European Association of Urology Section of Oncological Urology (ESOU) 2017 participants via e-mail. Submissions were accepted from April to June 2017. The topics for 15 questions of this survey included the habit of delivering pIVC, the choice of drug, its dosage, related doubts or concerns, reasons not to perform pIVC, knowledge of the evidence, and surgical preferences for RNU. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Survey software was used for analyses. Logistic regression analyses were used to investigate the association between surgeons’ experience and caseloads with pIVC utilization. Results and limitations: Overall, 127 responses were collected (11.6%). About half of the participants (47%) regularly administered pIVC following RNU. The drug most commonly utilized was mitomycin (85%); 82% adhered to the standard dosage of 40 mg. Different administration protocols were adopted: ≤48 h (39%), 7–10 postoperative days (35%), >10 d (11%), and intraoperatively (10%). The evidence was supported by prospective randomized clinical trials for only 65% of responders. Among interviewees who did not deliver pIVC, the most commonly reported reasons were lack of supporting data (55%), fear of potential side effects (18%), and organizational hurdles (15%). Conclusions: Our research highlights the limited use of pIVC following RNU for UTUC, raising the question of how the compliance with level 1 evidence in the urological community may be promoted. Patient summary: Level 1 evidence supports the administration of single postoperative intravesical chemotherapy (pIVC) following radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), in order to decrease intravesical recurrence risk. The Young Academic Urologist Urothelial Cancer Group aimed to investigate the use of pIVC in daily practice among European colleagues. Our research highlights the limited use of pIVC (47%) following RNU for UTUC, raising the question of how the compliance with level 1 evidence in the urological community may be promoted.<br />SCOPUS: ar.j<br />info:eu-repo/semantics/published

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
26661683
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
European Urology Open Science, European Urology Open Science, Elsevier, 2020, 22, pp.45-50. ⟨10.1016/j.euros.2020.10.003⟩, European Urology Open Science, 22, European Urology Open Science, Vol 22, Iss, Pp 45-50 (2020)
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....74ba3005ac17146e8ce3a5039303a04b
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euros.2020.10.003⟩