Back to Search Start Over

Nationwide validation of the ISGPS risk classification for postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy

Authors :
J. Annelie Suurmeijer
Anouk M. Emmen
Bert A. Bonsing
Olivier R. Busch
Freek Daams
Casper H. van Eijck
Susan van Dieren
Ignace H. de Hingh
Tara M. Mackay
J. Sven Mieog
I. Quintus Molenaar
Martijn W. Stommel
Vincent E. de Meijer
Hjalmar C. van Santvoort
Bas Groot Koerkamp
Marc G. Besselink
Source :
Surgery, 173, 1248-1253, Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group 2023, ' Nationwide validation of the ISGPS risk classification for postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy : “Less is more” ', Surgery (United States), vol. 173, no. 5, pp. 1248-1253 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2023.01.004, Surgery, 173, 5, pp. 1248-1253
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Contains fulltext : 291891.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Closed access) BACKGROUND: The International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery 4-tier (ie, A-D) risk classification for postoperative pancreatic fistula grade B/C is based on pancreatic texture and pancreatic duct size: A (not-soft texture and pancreatic duct >3 mm), B (not-soft texture and pancreatic duct ≤3 mm), C (soft texture and pancreatic duct >3 mm), and D (soft texture and pancreatic duct ≤3 mm). This study aimed to validate the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery risk classification for postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy. METHODS: Consecutive patients after pancreatoduodenectomy for all indications (2014-2021) were included from the nationwide, mandatory Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Audit. The rate of postoperative pancreatic fistula grade B/C (according to the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery 2016 definition) was calculated per risk category. Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating curve (discrimination) and calibration plots. RESULTS: Overall, 3,900 patients were included in risk categories: A (n = 1,046), B (n = 498), C (n = 963), and D (n = 1,393) with corresponding postoperative pancreatic fistula grade B/C rates of 3.8%, 12.2%, 15.6%, and 29.6%. Per category, the in-hospital mortality rates were 1.3%, 3.4%, 2.9%, and 4.1%, P = .001. There was no difference in the rate of postoperative pancreatic fistula between risk categories B and C (12.2% vs 15.6%, P = .101). When simplifying the classification system to a 3-tier classification system (based on 0, 1, and 2 risk factors), the discrimination was not significantly different (area under the receiver operating curve 0.697 vs area under the receiver operating curve 0.701, P = .077). CONCLUSION: This validation of the 4-tier International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery risk classification for postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy confirmed its predictive value. However, as the 2 middle risk categories provide no added predictive value, a simplified 3-tier classification with comparable predictive value is proposed and should be validated in future prospective studies.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00396060 and 20142021
Volume :
173
Issue :
5
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Surgery (United States)
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....7605823f7529d868917228f0820a44f0