Sorry, I don't understand your search. ×
Back to Search Start Over

Treatment of Unstable Elbow Injuries with a Hinged Elbow Fixator

Authors :
Denise Eygendaal
Konrad Mader
Giuseppe Rollo
Ante Prkic
Luigi Meccariello
Vincenzo Caiaffa
Michele Bisaccia
Giuseppe Pica
Sonia Utrilla-Hernando
Roberta Pica
Graduate School
Orthopedic Surgery and Sports Medicine
ANS - Cellular & Molecular Mechanisms
AGEM - Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism
Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
Source :
Strategies in trauma and limb reconstruction, 17(2), 68-73. Springer-Verlag Italia, Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction, 17(2), 68-73. Springer-Verlag Italia
Publication Year :
2022
Publisher :
Springer-Verlag Italia, 2022.

Abstract

Introduction: Injuries around the elbow pose a challenging problem for orthopaedic surgeons. The complex bony architecture of the joint should be restored and the thin soft tissue envelope needs to be handled with meticulous care. Elbow instability is a complication seen after dislocations and fractures of the elbow and remains a treatment challenge. The purpose of this study was to provide subjective and objective results following the surgical treatment of unstable elbow dislocations with an external hinged fixation technique. Methods: Forty-six consecutive patients with complex trauma of the elbow with instability after ligament reconstruction were enrolled between January 2017 and December 2019. The parameters used to quantify the subjective and objective functional results were the Mayo Elbow Score (MES, objective) and Oxford Elbow Score (OES, subjective), and clinical stability of the elbow joint. We also performed a radiological follow-up of the fractures. Results: The mean MES and OES scores were good at the 12-month follow-up. We had 38 patients with stable joints and 8 patients with minor instability. Using the stress test, we saw a significant difference in the affected joint under varus stress (6.7 ± 1.8 mm) compared to the healthy joint (5.8 ± 1.2 mm) laterally. Furthermore, medially the gap was significantly larger (5.8 ± 0.8 mm, treated elbow) than the contralateral gap under valgus stress (4.3 ± 0.8 mm) (p

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
18288928 and 18288936
Volume :
17
Issue :
2
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....770f9ed8de3b996db6f36c4e4b572d4f
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1553